This chapter concludes the analysis of Serbian urban and spatial planning history through the lens of evolutionary resilience. It highlights that while the stages of growth, conservation, destruction, and reorganisation can be identified, the transitions between these phases often involve abrupt changes, with each new period often disregarding previous developments. The chapter contrasts the socialist and post-2000 periods, noting that despite some resilience in the socialist era (e.g. seen in public participation mechanisms), these were constrained by political monopoly and lack of true pluralism. It argues that the recent phase of the planning system transformation lacks the essential rationality of its socialist predecessor, focusing instead on instrumental rationality, however, very much affected by the political currents. The chapter offers recommendations for improving planning communication to enhance the resilience of planning, emphasising the need for institutional restructuring, diverse stakeholder collaboration, and enhanced planning expertise, which are particularly relevant for transitional societies. While providing valuable lessons for both scholars and practitioners in the field of spatial and urban planning and development, the chapter finally highlights the limitations of the research and future research suggestions.