Scholarlink

In the light of energy transition, existing systems have shown to be often characterised by fundamental challenges that could potentially threaten its functioning, particularly when exposed to extreme forms of stress. To overcome this, we argue that an inter- and transdisciplinary approach—aimed to integrate relevant stakeholder perspectives and acknowledge different spatial–temporal scales—can provide indications in relation to the development of resilience. In this context, the included contributions have highlighted that resilience remains a topic surrounded by promises and confusion, but also illustrate that improved conceptualisation and operationalisation of associated processes and structures can be realised. Through clustering these contributions—according to understanding, envisioning, analysing, and managing resilience of energy systems—a structured overview is provided. Based on obtained insights, various recommendations are given how resilience in energy systems can be realised. Also, some indications are given how policy advice could be improved by means of resilience monitoring.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Shaping and Monitoring Resilient Energy Systems—A Synthesis

  • 章节

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年

查看全文
  • Davy van Doren,
  • Bert Droste-Franke,
  • Michael Brand,
  • Karen Derendorf,
  • Gabriele Fohr,
  • Hans Christian Gils,
  • Matthias Kaiser,
  • Jörg Knieling,
  • Sebastian Lehnhoff,
  • Karsten von Maydell,
  • Tudor Mocanu,
  • Sigrid Prehofer,
  • Ortwin Renn,
  • Arnim von Gleich,
  • Wolfgang Weimer-Jehle,
  • Martin Wickel,
  • Henning Wigger,
  • Thomas H. W. Ziesemer

摘要

In the light of energy transition, existing systems have shown to be often characterised by fundamental challenges that could potentially threaten its functioning, particularly when exposed to extreme forms of stress. To overcome this, we argue that an inter- and transdisciplinary approach—aimed to integrate relevant stakeholder perspectives and acknowledge different spatial–temporal scales—can provide indications in relation to the development of resilience. In this context, the included contributions have highlighted that resilience remains a topic surrounded by promises and confusion, but also illustrate that improved conceptualisation and operationalisation of associated processes and structures can be realised. Through clustering these contributions—according to understanding, envisioning, analysing, and managing resilience of energy systems—a structured overview is provided. Based on obtained insights, various recommendations are given how resilience in energy systems can be realised. Also, some indications are given how policy advice could be improved by means of resilience monitoring.