Digitalization holds significant potential to improve the efficiency, flexibility, and sustainability of District Heating (DH) systems. However, the transition toward digitalized DH is often constrained by challenges beyond technology—such as regulatory uncertainty, unclear business models, fragmented organizational capacity, and misaligned stakeholder incentives. This paper offers a comparative, qualitative analysis of how digitalization is adopted, perceived, and implemented in DH systems in Denmark and Sweden—two of the most mature DH markets globally. Based on expert survey data collected under the IEA DHC Annex TS9 initiative, the study explores adoption trends across operational, customer-facing, and strategic domains. Findings reveal that while digital tools like smart meters, Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems, and AI-based analytics are being introduced, systemic barriers, such as General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) related constraints, lack of clear return on investment, and digital skills gaps, continue to slow progress. Denmark’s strengths in infrastructure and coordination contrast with Sweden’s more diverse but fragmented innovation landscape. The study identifies key enablers: tariff reform, regulatory sandboxes, and capacity building, and offers context-sensitive policy and strategic recommendations. These insights contribute to advancing digitalization in the DH sector and to shaping future research and policymaking in smart energy system transformation.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Digitalization in District Heating: Comparative Insights from Denmark and Sweden on Adoption, Barriers, and Value Creation

  • Zheng Ma,
  • Joy Dalmacio Billanes,
  • Kristina Lygnerud

摘要

Digitalization holds significant potential to improve the efficiency, flexibility, and sustainability of District Heating (DH) systems. However, the transition toward digitalized DH is often constrained by challenges beyond technology—such as regulatory uncertainty, unclear business models, fragmented organizational capacity, and misaligned stakeholder incentives. This paper offers a comparative, qualitative analysis of how digitalization is adopted, perceived, and implemented in DH systems in Denmark and Sweden—two of the most mature DH markets globally. Based on expert survey data collected under the IEA DHC Annex TS9 initiative, the study explores adoption trends across operational, customer-facing, and strategic domains. Findings reveal that while digital tools like smart meters, Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems, and AI-based analytics are being introduced, systemic barriers, such as General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) related constraints, lack of clear return on investment, and digital skills gaps, continue to slow progress. Denmark’s strengths in infrastructure and coordination contrast with Sweden’s more diverse but fragmented innovation landscape. The study identifies key enablers: tariff reform, regulatory sandboxes, and capacity building, and offers context-sensitive policy and strategic recommendations. These insights contribute to advancing digitalization in the DH sector and to shaping future research and policymaking in smart energy system transformation.