This chapter interrogates the fragility of modern democratic subjectivity. Democracy promises freedom and equality but often produces alienation, leveling, and identity crises. Tocqueville, Kierkegaard, and contemporary debates on identity politics illuminate how democratic man struggles with independence, conformity, and spiritual shallowness. Civil religion and technocratic rationality offer only superficial forms of belonging, masking the tragic depths of human existence. By revisiting Dostoevsky’s “Grand Inquisitor” and Christian personalism, the chapter argues that democracy requires a tragic awareness of its limits and dangers. Identity, authority, and individuality are fragile constructs that risk collapse without recognition of their tragic dimension. Democracy, it concludes, must cultivate responsibility, openness, and spiritual resilience rather than resting on procedural rationality. Only a tragic consciousness can preserve freedom against the very forces of rationalization and mediatisation that threaten to hollow it out from within.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The Questionable Soul of Democratic Man

  • Timo Slootweg

摘要

This chapter interrogates the fragility of modern democratic subjectivity. Democracy promises freedom and equality but often produces alienation, leveling, and identity crises. Tocqueville, Kierkegaard, and contemporary debates on identity politics illuminate how democratic man struggles with independence, conformity, and spiritual shallowness. Civil religion and technocratic rationality offer only superficial forms of belonging, masking the tragic depths of human existence. By revisiting Dostoevsky’s “Grand Inquisitor” and Christian personalism, the chapter argues that democracy requires a tragic awareness of its limits and dangers. Identity, authority, and individuality are fragile constructs that risk collapse without recognition of their tragic dimension. Democracy, it concludes, must cultivate responsibility, openness, and spiritual resilience rather than resting on procedural rationality. Only a tragic consciousness can preserve freedom against the very forces of rationalization and mediatisation that threaten to hollow it out from within.