Romanian musicology is currently attempting to redefine itself and reshape its tools and ideas. The biggest obstacle is that writings from the communist era have produced a mentality that is difficult to change among musicians and music researchers who continue to use the same old textbooks and music histories. School and university libraries are still full of titles that belonged to either the socialist realist Soviet musicology of the 1950s and 1960s or the nationalistic “protochronist” spirit that shaped Romanian culture, especially after 1970. This chapter is concerned with the nationalist discourse in post-World War II Romanian musicology. Centered on autochthonous “spirituality” and the “Romanian ethos,” Sandu-Dediu examines a number of case studies to observe how avant-garde composers, i.e., those who have looked to the West, have adapted to circumvent censorship and conceal their own convictions.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Writing and Rewriting Music Histories: Nationalist Ideology in Communist Romania

  • Valentina Sandu-Dediu

摘要

Romanian musicology is currently attempting to redefine itself and reshape its tools and ideas. The biggest obstacle is that writings from the communist era have produced a mentality that is difficult to change among musicians and music researchers who continue to use the same old textbooks and music histories. School and university libraries are still full of titles that belonged to either the socialist realist Soviet musicology of the 1950s and 1960s or the nationalistic “protochronist” spirit that shaped Romanian culture, especially after 1970. This chapter is concerned with the nationalist discourse in post-World War II Romanian musicology. Centered on autochthonous “spirituality” and the “Romanian ethos,” Sandu-Dediu examines a number of case studies to observe how avant-garde composers, i.e., those who have looked to the West, have adapted to circumvent censorship and conceal their own convictions.