The Blixen Sessions: Between Data Surplus and Didactic Poverty
摘要
This chapter focuses on what the pioneers of the field of practice themselves point out as strengths in incorporating chatbots into professional work processes. Thus, the plan is that the KB/Chat session will be tied to the Pioneer Teachers’ formulations of the chatbot as a learning expert who contributes to standard tasks, but also to didactically demanding tasks. This will tie KB/Chat’s session process correspondingly concretely to tasks around learning goals, exams, didactic initiatives and evaluation. The session’s themes around humanistic interpretation and analysis are still present, and the major authors are supplemented with Karen Blixen and the single work The African Farm. There is thus continuity between the chapters’ example materials, but also a shift in interest in Chat’s task solutions and role taking. Where Chat was previously discussion-oriented and characterized by debates among professionals in the literary public, there are stronger institutional ties to take into account when the Chat contribution for example is oriented towards an exam context. Against this background, the analysis of the contextual imprints of the KB/Chat relationship and Chat’s suggestions for task solutions is sharpened. At the same time, the analysis of the process is sharpened, where Chat’s contribution as a learning expert is optimized by the data bank’s sudden surplus of theme-relevant language blocks and genre-adequate structures. The analysis shows that the keywords ‘exam’ and ‘learning goals’ not only match the origins of the Pioneer Teachers’ task formulation, but trigger a data-generated verbal and structural surplus that relates to Blixen, but is oriented towards Bloom’s taxonomies. Next, the chapter’s process-analytic review clarifies how both the course of the session and Chat’s task solution reflect that the Blixen session is superimposed by Bloom’s structures.