The Macmillan Plan of 1958 epitomized Britain’s hegemonic strategy to impose a tripartite framework on Cyprus, masking imperialist interests behind the veneer of compromise. Rather than promoting self-determination, the plan institutionalized ethnic division through separate parliaments and dual citizenship, laying the groundwork for partition. It enabled Turkey’s formal return to Cypriot affairs after an 80-year absence, undermining internal sovereignty and violating popular will. Britain’s covert support for Turkey’s partitionist ambitions, coupled with the manipulation of intercommunal tensions, reveals a calculated effort to retain strategic control without direct governance. The plan’s rejection by all sides—Greek, Turkish, and Cypriot—underscored its illegitimacy and its alignment with hegemonic priorities rather than democratic principles.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The Macmillan Plan: A Hegemonic Strategy of Imposed Partition

  • Nicos Panayiotides

摘要

The Macmillan Plan of 1958 epitomized Britain’s hegemonic strategy to impose a tripartite framework on Cyprus, masking imperialist interests behind the veneer of compromise. Rather than promoting self-determination, the plan institutionalized ethnic division through separate parliaments and dual citizenship, laying the groundwork for partition. It enabled Turkey’s formal return to Cypriot affairs after an 80-year absence, undermining internal sovereignty and violating popular will. Britain’s covert support for Turkey’s partitionist ambitions, coupled with the manipulation of intercommunal tensions, reveals a calculated effort to retain strategic control without direct governance. The plan’s rejection by all sides—Greek, Turkish, and Cypriot—underscored its illegitimacy and its alignment with hegemonic priorities rather than democratic principles.