This paper investigates the task of automatic topic classification for Vietnamese educational text data. We contribute a novel dataset annotated with nine prevalent topics discussed among Vietnamese students on social media platforms. The dataset inherently suffers from class imbalance issues, where some topics are significantly less frequent than others. To address this challenge, instead of using the conventional cross-entropy loss, we propose utilizing an alternative Dice loss function, a function typically used in image segmentation, for imbalanced learning. We employ a pre-trained language BERT model as the backbone for text feature extraction. Experimental results on the newly built dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method in handling imbalanced class distributions within the Vietnamese education domain. Specifically, using the Dice loss increases the F1 score by 79.72% compared to using CE loss.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Detecting Discussion Topics Among Students on Vietnamese Social Media Platforms Using Deep Learning

  • Thuy-Linh Ngo,
  • Doan-Dong Nguyen,
  • Thi-Oanh Tran

摘要

This paper investigates the task of automatic topic classification for Vietnamese educational text data. We contribute a novel dataset annotated with nine prevalent topics discussed among Vietnamese students on social media platforms. The dataset inherently suffers from class imbalance issues, where some topics are significantly less frequent than others. To address this challenge, instead of using the conventional cross-entropy loss, we propose utilizing an alternative Dice loss function, a function typically used in image segmentation, for imbalanced learning. We employ a pre-trained language BERT model as the backbone for text feature extraction. Experimental results on the newly built dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method in handling imbalanced class distributions within the Vietnamese education domain. Specifically, using the Dice loss increases the F1 score by 79.72% compared to using CE loss.