Scholarlink

This chapter draws upon Roland Barthes’ Mythologies to advance an understanding of the present generally and of conspiracy culture specifically as experiencing a crisis of interpretation. Discusses the structural similarities between the three eponymous designations, and the implications thereof. Following from this, I argue that many sociological/psychological research premises regarding conspiracy culture, as discussed previously, are tautological and serve to perpetuate a status quo and compound the socio-economic difficulties experiences by marginalized communities.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Investigative Journalism, Amateur Scholarship, or Conspiracy Theorizing? Hey, What’s Your Problem, Anyway?

  • 章节

  • 发表日期：

    2025年

查看全文
  • Daniel C. Mazurek

摘要

This chapter draws upon Roland Barthes’ Mythologies to advance an understanding of the present generally and of conspiracy culture specifically as experiencing a crisis of interpretation. Discusses the structural similarities between the three eponymous designations, and the implications thereof. Following from this, I argue that many sociological/psychological research premises regarding conspiracy culture, as discussed previously, are tautological and serve to perpetuate a status quo and compound the socio-economic difficulties experiences by marginalized communities.