Beginning with a misguided attempt to decode Daniel Paul Schreber’s Memoirs via computational analysis, this introduction draws attention to a central ethical concern articulated within Mad Studies literature (and beyond) concerning acts of epistemic violence performed on written narratives of madness. I introduce Lacanian theory as a means to tackle this conundrum by examining Lacan’s thought in respect of paranoia, the split nature of knowledge (connaissance/savoir) as well as his earlier notion of ‘schizographie’. In essence, this introduction begins to tease out a philosophical argument demonstrating how madness and knowledge are not distinct, mutually incompatible entities, but in fact circle around the same issues at the heart of subject formation, epistemology and ontology.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Introduction: Schreber Re-coded

  • Alan Bristow

摘要

Beginning with a misguided attempt to decode Daniel Paul Schreber’s Memoirs via computational analysis, this introduction draws attention to a central ethical concern articulated within Mad Studies literature (and beyond) concerning acts of epistemic violence performed on written narratives of madness. I introduce Lacanian theory as a means to tackle this conundrum by examining Lacan’s thought in respect of paranoia, the split nature of knowledge (connaissance/savoir) as well as his earlier notion of ‘schizographie’. In essence, this introduction begins to tease out a philosophical argument demonstrating how madness and knowledge are not distinct, mutually incompatible entities, but in fact circle around the same issues at the heart of subject formation, epistemology and ontology.