In order to conclude, I aim to demonstrate the far-reaching implications of the proposed Hegelian theory of divine revelation. I carve out two contexts for this demonstration: (a) the immediate philosophical aftermath of Hegel’s death in terms of the resulting striations between Left and Right Hegelians and (b) subsequent philosophical components of twentieth-century phenomenology, including central constructs from Husserlian and Heideggerian phenomenologies in addition to key notions from the theological turn of French phenomenology. Put otherwise, I attempt to showcase how the given perspective on Hegel’s religious phenomenology bridges the divide between Left and Right Hegelians on one hand and anticipates major developments for twentieth-century phenomenology on the other, especially (for the latter) the crucial and ubiquitous concept of the event.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Conclusion

  • Jason Barton

摘要

In order to conclude, I aim to demonstrate the far-reaching implications of the proposed Hegelian theory of divine revelation. I carve out two contexts for this demonstration: (a) the immediate philosophical aftermath of Hegel’s death in terms of the resulting striations between Left and Right Hegelians and (b) subsequent philosophical components of twentieth-century phenomenology, including central constructs from Husserlian and Heideggerian phenomenologies in addition to key notions from the theological turn of French phenomenology. Put otherwise, I attempt to showcase how the given perspective on Hegel’s religious phenomenology bridges the divide between Left and Right Hegelians on one hand and anticipates major developments for twentieth-century phenomenology on the other, especially (for the latter) the crucial and ubiquitous concept of the event.