At the book’s philosophical heart, this chapter probes the tension between faithfully preserving historical records—even if they are exclusionary—and the contemporary imperative to rectify past injustices. It explores postmodernist ideas of multiple narratives and Nagarjunian relational principles, arguing that history is inherently contested and context-dependent. Rather than forcing a choice between authenticity or inclusivity, AI can act as a mediator, juxtaposing conflicting perspectives, maintaining fidelity to documented sources, while also foregrounding the ethical responsibility to recognize marginalized voices.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Balancing Historical Authenticity and Modern Inclusivity

  • Somendra Narayan

摘要

At the book’s philosophical heart, this chapter probes the tension between faithfully preserving historical records—even if they are exclusionary—and the contemporary imperative to rectify past injustices. It explores postmodernist ideas of multiple narratives and Nagarjunian relational principles, arguing that history is inherently contested and context-dependent. Rather than forcing a choice between authenticity or inclusivity, AI can act as a mediator, juxtaposing conflicting perspectives, maintaining fidelity to documented sources, while also foregrounding the ethical responsibility to recognize marginalized voices.