The applications of artificial intelligence in education (AIED) are increasingly subject to scrutiny concerning the fairness of their automated decision-making processes (e.g., auto-grading, problem sequencing, personalization, interventions). However, little attention has been paid to the fairness of the procedures by which these algorithmic decisions are made, i.e., their procedural fairness. This procedural fairness is of critical importance; even seemingly fair decisions can be objectionable to students, teachers, and other stakeholders if the decision-making process itself is unfair. Without a structured framework, AIED applications risk perpetuating biases that disadvantage certain groups, deepen educational inequalities, and marginalize minority voices. Our full-day Fair4AIED workshop will take the first steps toward developing a blueprint to systematically integrate algorithmic fairness into AIED research, practice, and adoption. Participants are engaged in short-lightning talks, Q&A sessions, and discussions to explore opportunities to improve fairness and raise awareness of its importance for AIED. Subsequently, small-group discussions followed by a world-café-based session foster a structured, hands-on approach to envision the blueprint’s content.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Fair4AIED 2025: First International Workshop on Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making for Education

  • Clara Belitz,
  • Nigel Bosch,
  • Lan Jiang,
  • Ioana Jivet,
  • Badmavasan Kirouchenassamy,
  • HaeJin Lee,
  • Barbara Leporini,
  • Francesca Maridina Malloci,
  • Mirko Marras,
  • Daniela Rotelli,
  • Frank Stinar

摘要

The applications of artificial intelligence in education (AIED) are increasingly subject to scrutiny concerning the fairness of their automated decision-making processes (e.g., auto-grading, problem sequencing, personalization, interventions). However, little attention has been paid to the fairness of the procedures by which these algorithmic decisions are made, i.e., their procedural fairness. This procedural fairness is of critical importance; even seemingly fair decisions can be objectionable to students, teachers, and other stakeholders if the decision-making process itself is unfair. Without a structured framework, AIED applications risk perpetuating biases that disadvantage certain groups, deepen educational inequalities, and marginalize minority voices. Our full-day Fair4AIED workshop will take the first steps toward developing a blueprint to systematically integrate algorithmic fairness into AIED research, practice, and adoption. Participants are engaged in short-lightning talks, Q&A sessions, and discussions to explore opportunities to improve fairness and raise awareness of its importance for AIED. Subsequently, small-group discussions followed by a world-café-based session foster a structured, hands-on approach to envision the blueprint’s content.