In general, governance is described as the set of decisions, actors, processes, institutional structures and mechanisms, incorporating the division of authority and underlying norms involved in determining a course of action (Adger et al. in Adapting to climate change: Thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge University Press, 2010; Pelling in Adaptation to climate change: From resilience to transformation. Routledge, 2011). This concept can be applied to climate change governance. An important finding from this definition is that governance is not related to public-sector actors alone but encompasses all relevant actors in decision-making. These actors maintain some arrangements, often in association with each other, for new initiatives and creating partnerships (Forino et al. in Int J Disaster Risk Sci 6:372–384, 2015). Governance often conveys a ‘Janus face’ (Swyngedouw in Urban Stud 42:1991–2006, 2005) that moves away from an ideal decision-making process; from collective goals and benefits towards the legitimisation of privileged actors with different goals and priorities (Forino et al. in Int J Disaster Risk Sci 6:372–384, 2015).

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Literature Review—Climate Change Governance in Bangladesh—Perspectives of Governmental and Non-governmental Organisations

  • Md. Faruk Hossain,
  • Salim Momtaz

摘要

In general, governance is described as the set of decisions, actors, processes, institutional structures and mechanisms, incorporating the division of authority and underlying norms involved in determining a course of action (Adger et al. in Adapting to climate change: Thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge University Press, 2010; Pelling in Adaptation to climate change: From resilience to transformation. Routledge, 2011). This concept can be applied to climate change governance. An important finding from this definition is that governance is not related to public-sector actors alone but encompasses all relevant actors in decision-making. These actors maintain some arrangements, often in association with each other, for new initiatives and creating partnerships (Forino et al. in Int J Disaster Risk Sci 6:372–384, 2015). Governance often conveys a ‘Janus face’ (Swyngedouw in Urban Stud 42:1991–2006, 2005) that moves away from an ideal decision-making process; from collective goals and benefits towards the legitimisation of privileged actors with different goals and priorities (Forino et al. in Int J Disaster Risk Sci 6:372–384, 2015).