Scholarlink

The philosophy of science has long debated the methodological challenges associated with employing historical case studies. Among the key challenges encountered in undertaking this form of contextual philosophy of science are ‘construction bias’ and ‘selection bias’. In this chapter, I contend that these methodological concerns can be pertinent to moral philosophers who utilize case studies within the family of approaches comprising the field of contextual ethics. However, the chapter is also a text experiment.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Bias, Blind Spots, and Cherry-Picking: Methodological Challenges in Contextual Ethics

  • 章节

  • 发表日期：

    2025年

查看全文
  • Cecilie Eriksen

摘要

The philosophy of science has long debated the methodological challenges associated with employing historical case studies. Among the key challenges encountered in undertaking this form of contextual philosophy of science are ‘construction bias’ and ‘selection bias’. In this chapter, I contend that these methodological concerns can be pertinent to moral philosophers who utilize case studies within the family of approaches comprising the field of contextual ethics. However, the chapter is also a text experiment.