Urban transportation and urban mobility (UM) are interconnected yet distinct. Urban transportation focuses on the execution of trips for passengers and cargo, while urban mobility considers the overall service provided within the urban context. Although urban transportation offers benefits, it can also lead to significant social, physical, and economic drawbacks that may overshadow its positive effects. Urban circulation is vital in shaping how residents navigate the city, influencing access to essential services, job opportunities, and social interactions. An effective circulation system improves urban mobility by facilitating equitable access to all areas, minimizing congestion, and reducing negative externalities like pollution and social isolation. However, inequities in these systems can exacerbate challenges for vulnerable populations, particularly those in peripheral regions. Research on urban air mobility must go beyond assessing travel’s role in city development to address the adverse effects of transportation, such as pollution and social inequality. It should aim to promote sustainable urban development, enhance residents’ quality of life, and meet the needs of all stakeholders. The introduction of urban air mobility through EVTOL presents advantages, but it risks deepening social disparities if not planned equitably. To mitigate these risks, integrating EVTOL into existing urban circulation systems is essential, ensuring equitable access for vulnerable groups. This includes addressing “supra-commute” challenges, where individuals travel long distances for better opportunities. This contribution builds on discussions from the IDEAS 2022 conference and proposes a sustainable framework for EVTOL that prioritizes collective well-being in metropolitan areas.