Although the decolonization of the Fourth World has not yet come, resistance has never dissipated, and in recent years, an indigenous resurgence can be felt, particularly in literary fiction. “Pterodactyl, Puran Sahay, and Pirtha,” by Mahasweta Devi, precedes this shift, and rather than showing a fierce corpo-political-epistemic struggle against essentialism, instead depicts a passive, non-violent, self-acceptance of annihilation. In the process of India’s modern nation-building, despite constitutional protections, Adivasi presented with the impossible choice to either assimilate into the dominant mainstream, starve, or abandon their ancestral land, being reduced to an internally colonized subject. Whether an “administrative failure or deliberate cruelty” these misguided NGOs, apathetic government workers, and predatory landlords and pimps all appear to be unable to acknowledge the rights of these people, let alone help them. This cultural untranslatability is represented ecosemiotically through a more-than-human character that acts as a mediator between the young Adivasi Bikhia and the journalist Puran Sahay, who has come to Pirtha to investigate the appearance of the prehistoric creature during a severe drought and man-made famine. This chapter will analyze the role of the pterodactyl and reflect upon indigenous silence, where to live is a quiet affront to their apocalypse.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Assimilation or Annihilation? The Failure of Cultural Translation in Mahasweta Devi’s “Pterodactyl”

  • Candace Goodrich

摘要

Although the decolonization of the Fourth World has not yet come, resistance has never dissipated, and in recent years, an indigenous resurgence can be felt, particularly in literary fiction. “Pterodactyl, Puran Sahay, and Pirtha,” by Mahasweta Devi, precedes this shift, and rather than showing a fierce corpo-political-epistemic struggle against essentialism, instead depicts a passive, non-violent, self-acceptance of annihilation. In the process of India’s modern nation-building, despite constitutional protections, Adivasi presented with the impossible choice to either assimilate into the dominant mainstream, starve, or abandon their ancestral land, being reduced to an internally colonized subject. Whether an “administrative failure or deliberate cruelty” these misguided NGOs, apathetic government workers, and predatory landlords and pimps all appear to be unable to acknowledge the rights of these people, let alone help them. This cultural untranslatability is represented ecosemiotically through a more-than-human character that acts as a mediator between the young Adivasi Bikhia and the journalist Puran Sahay, who has come to Pirtha to investigate the appearance of the prehistoric creature during a severe drought and man-made famine. This chapter will analyze the role of the pterodactyl and reflect upon indigenous silence, where to live is a quiet affront to their apocalypse.