The clinical and physiological impacts of short bowel syndrome (SBS) have been well-documented, yet its humanistic burden, including psychological, social, and quality of life aspects, has not been as thoroughly explored. Due to the ongoing need for medical interventions, dietary restrictions, and the constant risk of complications, patients with SBS often experience severe emotional distress, including fear, hopelessness, and a lowered sense of well-being. The illness has a major influence on day-to-day living, affecting family dynamics, work prospects, and social interactions. Frequent hospital stays and ongoing medical care also add to financial pressures. The stigma attached to ostomies and other visible medical devices, as well as the disorder’s invisible character, which can make it difficult for peers and medical professionals to understand and support them, adds to this humanistic burden. Improving overall patient treatment, building psychological resilience, and raising quality of life all depend on addressing the humanistic elements of SBS. Future clinical and research efforts should prioritize holistic treatments that integrate social support networks, patient education, and psychological counseling alongside physical treatment.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Humanistic Burden of Short Bowel Syndrome

  • Anca Trifan,
  • Ana-Maria Singeap,
  • Ermina Stratina,
  • Carol Stanciu

摘要

The clinical and physiological impacts of short bowel syndrome (SBS) have been well-documented, yet its humanistic burden, including psychological, social, and quality of life aspects, has not been as thoroughly explored. Due to the ongoing need for medical interventions, dietary restrictions, and the constant risk of complications, patients with SBS often experience severe emotional distress, including fear, hopelessness, and a lowered sense of well-being. The illness has a major influence on day-to-day living, affecting family dynamics, work prospects, and social interactions. Frequent hospital stays and ongoing medical care also add to financial pressures. The stigma attached to ostomies and other visible medical devices, as well as the disorder’s invisible character, which can make it difficult for peers and medical professionals to understand and support them, adds to this humanistic burden. Improving overall patient treatment, building psychological resilience, and raising quality of life all depend on addressing the humanistic elements of SBS. Future clinical and research efforts should prioritize holistic treatments that integrate social support networks, patient education, and psychological counseling alongside physical treatment.