Scholarlink

This paper explores the AI policies, frameworks, and guidelines established by Nordic universities (from Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden). The Nordic countries share characteristics such as a strong infrastructure supporting educational technology integration. The aim is to find similarities, differences, and gaps between the guidelines of Nordic universities in order to make the guidelines more practical and valuable for teachers and students. The theoretical framework focuses on guidelines and principles based on AI ethics, especially in higher education. A content analysis was conducted on 39 documents from 12 universities. The analysis reveals two major themes in the documents: (1) Use of AI in Higher Education and (2) Ethical principles of AI in Higher Education guidelines. Nordic universities are committed to leveraging AI responsibly while maintaining ethical, pedagogical, and institutional integrity. The results of this study give valuable insights into what kind of issues should be considered in guidelines of ethical AI in higher education and how, in addition to principles, practical examples are also needed for both teaching and learning. The results show that more research, common discussion, and collaboration are required. Additionally, the absence of societal and environmental well-being factors indicates room for continuous development of the policies.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

“Do As Your Teacher Tells You!” How Is AI Use Regulated in Nordic Higher Education Institutions?

  • 会议论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年

查看全文
  • Sigurbjörg Jóhannesdóttir,
  • Päivi Kousa,
  • Salme Korkala,
  • Jenny Tarvainen,
  • Kristín Björnsdóttir,
  • Judit Háhn,
  • Susanne Dau,
  • Eva Irene Brooks,
  • Jeanette Sjöberg,
  • Skúlína Hlíf Kjartansdóttir,
  • Nataliya Berbyuk Lindström,
  • Sylvana Sofkova Hashemi,
  • Mona Lundin,
  • Shola Oyedeji,
  • Robin Støckert

摘要

This paper explores the AI policies, frameworks, and guidelines established by Nordic universities (from Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden). The Nordic countries share characteristics such as a strong infrastructure supporting educational technology integration. The aim is to find similarities, differences, and gaps between the guidelines of Nordic universities in order to make the guidelines more practical and valuable for teachers and students. The theoretical framework focuses on guidelines and principles based on AI ethics, especially in higher education. A content analysis was conducted on 39 documents from 12 universities. The analysis reveals two major themes in the documents: (1) Use of AI in Higher Education and (2) Ethical principles of AI in Higher Education guidelines. Nordic universities are committed to leveraging AI responsibly while maintaining ethical, pedagogical, and institutional integrity. The results of this study give valuable insights into what kind of issues should be considered in guidelines of ethical AI in higher education and how, in addition to principles, practical examples are also needed for both teaching and learning. The results show that more research, common discussion, and collaboration are required. Additionally, the absence of societal and environmental well-being factors indicates room for continuous development of the policies.