Chapter 4 evaluates Kantian ethics of sex, considering both Kant’s original framework and the revised interpretations of Allen Wood and Helga Varden. Kant’s traditional views, alongside classical natural law, are uniquely capable of explaining most commonsense sexual prohibitions—however, only because it seems he borrowed from natural law when it comes to the bedroom. To this he added rigid concerns about objectification and violation of the Formula of Humanity that implies a prudish obligation that couples minimize sex. Kant thus cannot account for the goodness of spousal sexuality. Wood and Varden propose a different natural purpose for sex, allowing far greater sexual liberty than Kant—or common sense, for that matter—could accept.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Kant and Neo-Kantian Sexual Ethics

  • Brian Besong

摘要

Chapter 4 evaluates Kantian ethics of sex, considering both Kant’s original framework and the revised interpretations of Allen Wood and Helga Varden. Kant’s traditional views, alongside classical natural law, are uniquely capable of explaining most commonsense sexual prohibitions—however, only because it seems he borrowed from natural law when it comes to the bedroom. To this he added rigid concerns about objectification and violation of the Formula of Humanity that implies a prudish obligation that couples minimize sex. Kant thus cannot account for the goodness of spousal sexuality. Wood and Varden propose a different natural purpose for sex, allowing far greater sexual liberty than Kant—or common sense, for that matter—could accept.