Smith emphasises the importance of sufficient capitalCapitals for economic prosperity, which is achieved through saving rather than consumption. He argues that both individual means and the prosperity of society as a whole arise from the accumulation and productive use of capitalCapitals, condemning prodigality and idle capitalCapitals as obstacles to economic growth. Smith extols thrift, drawing on Puritan valuesValues, and contrasts it with wasteful behaviour, which harms society. He critiques government mismanagement of finances, stressing that the economic competence and thriftiness of individuals sustain the state. Smith also elaborates on the structure of wealth, distinguishing between immediate consumption, capitalCapitals for income generation, and non-consumed items. Smith’s macroeconomic perspective includes a detailed analysis of circulating capitalCapitals, which generates income only when it moves through various hands. He differentiates between productive and unproductive labourLabour, with the former increasing national wealth by creating durable goods. He critiques state intervention in capitalCapitals flows, advocating for economic freedom and natural investment courses. Smith’s nuanced examination of luxuryLuxuries reveals it as both an economic and moral issue. He refutes Bernard Mandeville’sMandeville, B. extreme view that all non-essential consumption is luxuryLuxuries, instead recognizing the social and economic roles of luxuryLuxuries goods. Smith argues that while luxuryLuxuries can promote employment and economic activity, moderation and self-control are crucial for individual well-being and the advancement of society. He suggests that social norms and economic conditions define what constitutes luxuryLuxuries, which evolves over time. Smith’s insights into consumerConsumers behaviour and the impact of luxuryLuxuries on society lead to his advocacy for rational, moderate consumption. He suggests that appeals to reason and self-control can channel human impulses into socially beneficial actions. TaxesTaxes on luxuryLuxuries goods may regulate consumption patterns, balancing economic benefits with social moderation. Smith ultimately sees the competent management of luxuryLuxuries consumption as essential for maintaining social stability and enhancing overall prosperity.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Parsimony, Wealth, Luxury

  • Thomas Rommel,
  • Helen Winter

摘要

Smith emphasises the importance of sufficient capitalCapitals for economic prosperity, which is achieved through saving rather than consumption. He argues that both individual means and the prosperity of society as a whole arise from the accumulation and productive use of capitalCapitals, condemning prodigality and idle capitalCapitals as obstacles to economic growth. Smith extols thrift, drawing on Puritan valuesValues, and contrasts it with wasteful behaviour, which harms society. He critiques government mismanagement of finances, stressing that the economic competence and thriftiness of individuals sustain the state. Smith also elaborates on the structure of wealth, distinguishing between immediate consumption, capitalCapitals for income generation, and non-consumed items. Smith’s macroeconomic perspective includes a detailed analysis of circulating capitalCapitals, which generates income only when it moves through various hands. He differentiates between productive and unproductive labourLabour, with the former increasing national wealth by creating durable goods. He critiques state intervention in capitalCapitals flows, advocating for economic freedom and natural investment courses. Smith’s nuanced examination of luxuryLuxuries reveals it as both an economic and moral issue. He refutes Bernard Mandeville’sMandeville, B. extreme view that all non-essential consumption is luxuryLuxuries, instead recognizing the social and economic roles of luxuryLuxuries goods. Smith argues that while luxuryLuxuries can promote employment and economic activity, moderation and self-control are crucial for individual well-being and the advancement of society. He suggests that social norms and economic conditions define what constitutes luxuryLuxuries, which evolves over time. Smith’s insights into consumerConsumers behaviour and the impact of luxuryLuxuries on society lead to his advocacy for rational, moderate consumption. He suggests that appeals to reason and self-control can channel human impulses into socially beneficial actions. TaxesTaxes on luxuryLuxuries goods may regulate consumption patterns, balancing economic benefits with social moderation. Smith ultimately sees the competent management of luxuryLuxuries consumption as essential for maintaining social stability and enhancing overall prosperity.