Politics and Diplomacy of Symbolic Organisations
摘要
For a considerable period, the doctrine of the sole or absolute truth—for example, the ecclesiastical truth of the Roma—fostered a culture of persuasion over debate. Subsequently, during the Enlightenment and Positivism, religious, ideological and cultural attitudes became intertwined with the unquestionable conclusions of “hard” scientific thinking—that is to say, mathematical and geometric—and equally ruthless politics. However, contemporary discourses have witnessed a paradigm shift, with the acknowledgement of the malleability of cultural significations and the imperative for deliberation, leading to the evolution of artistic and literary discourses into a domain of cultural politics and diplomacy. This emergent paradigm is typified by the pursuit of debate, non-compulsory resolutions, and the fluidity of symbolic organisations. The concept of alien gods has undergone a shift in perception, becoming less threatening yet more appealing to the public. Consequently, contemporary public diplomacy is predicated on a philosophy of dialogue, eschewing the dogmas of ideology or religion in favour of a more malleable and accommodating approach to truth. Cultural philosophy is an evolving discipline that responds to emergent trends in various artistic and cultural forms, including film, literature, and theatre. However, it does not subscribe to a Manichean worldview, which posits a dichotomous and binary perspective on reality. In order to envisage a peaceful and dynamic future for humanity, it is imperative to acknowledge the pivotal role of public diplomacy in shaping contemporary political models and future political philosophies. These models encompass a range of approaches to political thought and facilitate peaceful interpretation and interaction among different groups. Each socio-cultural group is predicated on a distinct symbolic organisation and a unique set of framing rules, and the disparities between them are in a state of perpetual flux and evolution.