Placed at the intersection of language policy and planning, language ideology, and translation studies, the present chapter centres on the way in which linguistic labels such as ‘non-sexist’, ‘gender-neutral’, ‘gender-sensitive’, and ‘gender-inclusive’ are currently employed in Romanian. In its focus on gender-inclusive labels concerning language, the analysis dwells on the gender equality plans and guidelines of prominent higher education institutions in Romania, which play a representative role in language policy formation. It is emphasized that such guidelines emerge as part of a complex negotiation between the gender equality recommendations of the European Union and the standard imposed by the Romanian Academy, as a significant language policy maker. Taking as a point of reference the concept of ‘covert translation’ (House, A model for translation quality assessment, Narr, 1977; Translation quality assessment: A model revisited, Narr, 1997; Applied Linguistics, 41(1), 10–29, 2020), the chapter discusses Romanian gender-inclusive labels in terms of recontextualization. This recontextualization is seen as dependent on the attitudes, norms, and ideologies currently embraced by the translators and language policy makers in Romania.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Gender-Inclusive Romanian: Labels and Institutional Representations

  • Ruxandra Vișan

摘要

Placed at the intersection of language policy and planning, language ideology, and translation studies, the present chapter centres on the way in which linguistic labels such as ‘non-sexist’, ‘gender-neutral’, ‘gender-sensitive’, and ‘gender-inclusive’ are currently employed in Romanian. In its focus on gender-inclusive labels concerning language, the analysis dwells on the gender equality plans and guidelines of prominent higher education institutions in Romania, which play a representative role in language policy formation. It is emphasized that such guidelines emerge as part of a complex negotiation between the gender equality recommendations of the European Union and the standard imposed by the Romanian Academy, as a significant language policy maker. Taking as a point of reference the concept of ‘covert translation’ (House, A model for translation quality assessment, Narr, 1977; Translation quality assessment: A model revisited, Narr, 1997; Applied Linguistics, 41(1), 10–29, 2020), the chapter discusses Romanian gender-inclusive labels in terms of recontextualization. This recontextualization is seen as dependent on the attitudes, norms, and ideologies currently embraced by the translators and language policy makers in Romania.