The aim of this chapter is to analyse the issues and concerns raised in relation to the implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights (EPSR) using the framework of governance within the European Union (EU) as a basis of analysis. We examine two methods of governance: the Open Method of Coordination (OMC) and the Community Method (CM). After an in-depth review of these two methods, an extensive analysis of the history and legal nature of the EPSR is presented. Having placed the EPSR within the wider framework of the EU’s modus operandi, an evaluation of the different possibilities and issues that arise from its implementation at the supranational and national levels through either the OMC or the CM is presented, followed by a conclusion on the ways through which the EPSR could be more effectively implemented.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The Governance of the European Pillar of Social Rights: Open Method of Coordination or Community Method?

  • Alexandros Kyriakidis,
  • Ioannis Papadopoulos

摘要

The aim of this chapter is to analyse the issues and concerns raised in relation to the implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights (EPSR) using the framework of governance within the European Union (EU) as a basis of analysis. We examine two methods of governance: the Open Method of Coordination (OMC) and the Community Method (CM). After an in-depth review of these two methods, an extensive analysis of the history and legal nature of the EPSR is presented. Having placed the EPSR within the wider framework of the EU’s modus operandi, an evaluation of the different possibilities and issues that arise from its implementation at the supranational and national levels through either the OMC or the CM is presented, followed by a conclusion on the ways through which the EPSR could be more effectively implemented.