The aim of this study is to conduct a full analysis of the elements, types and impact of economic crimes on various jurisdictions and legal provisions and procedural management, the most important economic crimes that have affected the modern world since the times of the pharaohs, still pose a real threat to both nations, communities and individuals, especially in times marked by the spread of globalization, where sovereignty and financial stability are the main targets of these crimes. The fight against economic crimes requires legislative intervention by establishing specific laws in this field in order to effectively combat these crimes and limit their spread. The legislative response to economic crimes has been influenced by technological development, which has led to a process of integration of both worlds, where the most significant form of integration is the dissemination of digital tools and systems in the legislative process. Legislative measures relating to economic crimes are covered by various laws, in addition to the Criminal Code, which provides a general framework and covers crimes such as theft, fraud and corruption. These crimes have different categories, which can be divided into three main categories: forgery, false documents and false accounts, fraud and fraud, abuse of commercial trust and abuse of credit. In addition to specific laws on economic crimes, such as the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Act, where penalties and procedures are specific and different for each law. Technological developments have influenced this legal framework, developing criminal procedures and increasing their efficiency and effectiveness. The study also examines jurisdictions in matters of economic crimes and the authorities responsible for adjudicating these crimes. The study highlights the difference between judicial and extrajudicial authority to adjudicate economic crimes. The study also indicates the type of penalties for economic crimes, where the penalty for an economic crime is both criminal and non-punishable and affects the freedom, good name and financial status of the perpetrator. The study includes tools for judicial and extrajudicial adjudication of economic crimes in which courts and administrative authorities participate. The study also raised the need to develop a legal framework to keep pace with technological developments to ensure a robust and effective response to the challenges of economic crime.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Technological Enhancements in Subject Matter and Procedural Jurisdiction for Economic Crimes

  • Maher Ali Ahmad Alkhaldi

摘要

The aim of this study is to conduct a full analysis of the elements, types and impact of economic crimes on various jurisdictions and legal provisions and procedural management, the most important economic crimes that have affected the modern world since the times of the pharaohs, still pose a real threat to both nations, communities and individuals, especially in times marked by the spread of globalization, where sovereignty and financial stability are the main targets of these crimes. The fight against economic crimes requires legislative intervention by establishing specific laws in this field in order to effectively combat these crimes and limit their spread. The legislative response to economic crimes has been influenced by technological development, which has led to a process of integration of both worlds, where the most significant form of integration is the dissemination of digital tools and systems in the legislative process. Legislative measures relating to economic crimes are covered by various laws, in addition to the Criminal Code, which provides a general framework and covers crimes such as theft, fraud and corruption. These crimes have different categories, which can be divided into three main categories: forgery, false documents and false accounts, fraud and fraud, abuse of commercial trust and abuse of credit. In addition to specific laws on economic crimes, such as the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Act, where penalties and procedures are specific and different for each law. Technological developments have influenced this legal framework, developing criminal procedures and increasing their efficiency and effectiveness. The study also examines jurisdictions in matters of economic crimes and the authorities responsible for adjudicating these crimes. The study highlights the difference between judicial and extrajudicial authority to adjudicate economic crimes. The study also indicates the type of penalties for economic crimes, where the penalty for an economic crime is both criminal and non-punishable and affects the freedom, good name and financial status of the perpetrator. The study includes tools for judicial and extrajudicial adjudication of economic crimes in which courts and administrative authorities participate. The study also raised the need to develop a legal framework to keep pace with technological developments to ensure a robust and effective response to the challenges of economic crime.