The aim of burn care is the timely restoration of skin integrity (Brown TL, Muller MJ. Burns 29(3):197–198, 2003). The skin has a capacity for regeneration in superficial injuries, which is overwhelmed as the burn injury extends deeper into the hypodermisDermis and the time to healing extends (Finlay V et al. Scars Burns Heal 3:1–10, 2017). The longer the time taken to heal, the greater the risk of healing by scarring,Scarring with the lifelong loss of some skin functions (Wallace HJ et al. Burns 43(6):1271–1283, 2017). The most frequently used technique to heal a burn wound is autologous split-thickness skin grafting (STSGSplit thickness skin graft) (Ozhathil HJ et al. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) 57(4):380, 2021). There are limitations with the potential for both the recipient and donor site to leave a scarred area; site matching of the skin characteristics is challenging. The donor site may also leave a scar, and in larger injuries, the size of the donor site is inadequate (Bache SE et al. Burns, 2023).

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

ReCell

  • Fiona M. Wood

摘要

The aim of burn care is the timely restoration of skin integrity (Brown TL, Muller MJ. Burns 29(3):197–198, 2003). The skin has a capacity for regeneration in superficial injuries, which is overwhelmed as the burn injury extends deeper into the hypodermisDermis and the time to healing extends (Finlay V et al. Scars Burns Heal 3:1–10, 2017). The longer the time taken to heal, the greater the risk of healing by scarring,Scarring with the lifelong loss of some skin functions (Wallace HJ et al. Burns 43(6):1271–1283, 2017). The most frequently used technique to heal a burn wound is autologous split-thickness skin grafting (STSGSplit thickness skin graft) (Ozhathil HJ et al. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) 57(4):380, 2021). There are limitations with the potential for both the recipient and donor site to leave a scarred area; site matching of the skin characteristics is challenging. The donor site may also leave a scar, and in larger injuries, the size of the donor site is inadequate (Bache SE et al. Burns, 2023).