Literary and artistic depictions of the Holocaust have long been shaped by a strictly humanising impulse; that is to say, they have been produced by and for the human, and have aimed to emphasise the loss of six million Jewish victims as humans. Situating itself within emerging scholarship on the recent turn to the nonhuman within Holocaust representation and memorialisation, this chapter examines the unusual depiction of Jewish murder in Ravensbrück survivor and Czech Jew Juraj Herz’s macabre comedy horror The Cremator (Spalovač Mrtvol, 1969) as a distinctly nonhuman undertaking which complicates the abiding divisions characterising Holocaust studies: those of victim and perpetrator, but also of human and animal. Combining Holocaust scholarship with perspectives from art criticism and animal studies, it traces the film’s production of what Carrie Rohman has called a “creatural consciousness” or aesthetic, in which the on-screen presence of animals in addition to formally non-anthropocentric elements and aesthetics comes to express the “uncanny animality” of the Holocaust.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Surrealism and Creaturely Holocaust Killing in Juraj Herz’s The Cremator

  • Emily-Rose Baker

摘要

Literary and artistic depictions of the Holocaust have long been shaped by a strictly humanising impulse; that is to say, they have been produced by and for the human, and have aimed to emphasise the loss of six million Jewish victims as humans. Situating itself within emerging scholarship on the recent turn to the nonhuman within Holocaust representation and memorialisation, this chapter examines the unusual depiction of Jewish murder in Ravensbrück survivor and Czech Jew Juraj Herz’s macabre comedy horror The Cremator (Spalovač Mrtvol, 1969) as a distinctly nonhuman undertaking which complicates the abiding divisions characterising Holocaust studies: those of victim and perpetrator, but also of human and animal. Combining Holocaust scholarship with perspectives from art criticism and animal studies, it traces the film’s production of what Carrie Rohman has called a “creatural consciousness” or aesthetic, in which the on-screen presence of animals in addition to formally non-anthropocentric elements and aesthetics comes to express the “uncanny animality” of the Holocaust.