Along with many other United Nations entities, the UN Declaration for the Rights of Indigenous Peoples’ mandate in terms of Indigenous physical practices is based on a sport for development and peace (SDP) approach. SDP, however, is a problematic frame through which to engage in traditional games, as sports, and the modern sporting enterprise, are symptomatic of Western, capitalist, and (neo)colonialist tendencies. We argue that the international Indigenous SDP apparatus should instead be concerned with a games-for-reconciliation (GFR) approach, in which self-determination is the focal point in reconciliatory programme design.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Games for Reconciliation: UNDRIP, UNESCO, and Sport for Development

  • Tom Fabian,
  • Lyndsay M. C. Hayhurst,
  • Audrey R. Giles

摘要

Along with many other United Nations entities, the UN Declaration for the Rights of Indigenous Peoples’ mandate in terms of Indigenous physical practices is based on a sport for development and peace (SDP) approach. SDP, however, is a problematic frame through which to engage in traditional games, as sports, and the modern sporting enterprise, are symptomatic of Western, capitalist, and (neo)colonialist tendencies. We argue that the international Indigenous SDP apparatus should instead be concerned with a games-for-reconciliation (GFR) approach, in which self-determination is the focal point in reconciliatory programme design.