Humor exists in the voluminous Indian religious/philosophical literature. However, when we reach the more advanced levels of philosophy, it disappears, indeed, it is openly subverted and deprecated. In this contribution, it is suggested that we can understand this by applying Derrida’s concept of “hauntology” and demonstrating how the entire history of philosophical enquiry in India contradicts the major theories of humor. While humor survives as a pedagogical device, Indian philosophy points toward a singular Unity in which there can be no humor.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Indian Philosophy

  • Michel Clasquin-Johnson

摘要

Humor exists in the voluminous Indian religious/philosophical literature. However, when we reach the more advanced levels of philosophy, it disappears, indeed, it is openly subverted and deprecated. In this contribution, it is suggested that we can understand this by applying Derrida’s concept of “hauntology” and demonstrating how the entire history of philosophical enquiry in India contradicts the major theories of humor. While humor survives as a pedagogical device, Indian philosophy points toward a singular Unity in which there can be no humor.