Qualitative research is a popular research methodology, rivaling quantitative and mixed methods research in use to explain leadership, management, and organizational behavior. Five foundational levels of qualitative research, starting from the end in mind and intersecting in an iterative manner, can guide researchers. Philosophical debates abound, but a recommendation is to apply pragmatism to research choices while avoiding positivist post-positivism in all phases. Ethics is more than statements and platitudes, with ethics-in-action creating a continuous, open dialogue. Interviews are the most common method for data collection in qualitative research, but researchers often lack a systematic method to create interview protocols. Themes can be improved by systematic development across many levels, with models that recognize the rhizomatic and complex nature of most phenomena. Researchers should consider the Kantian notions of canon and organon, embracing a hermeneutical perspective. Trustworthiness and credibility should be considered from the start and challenged in each phase of research. Rigor and relevance result from systematicity, utility, relevance and representativeness, normotoxicity, and data-driven results and processes. Artificial intelligence (AI) must move front and center as a key component of all research phases. Beyond the norms and expectations of the researcher, academia, and the audience, qualitative research can showcase the multivocality of participants to improve validity and reliability.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Qualitative Research in Leadership and Organizational Studies

  • David C. Coker,
  • Wendy Kaaki,
  • Xinqing Dorcas Miao

摘要

Qualitative research is a popular research methodology, rivaling quantitative and mixed methods research in use to explain leadership, management, and organizational behavior. Five foundational levels of qualitative research, starting from the end in mind and intersecting in an iterative manner, can guide researchers. Philosophical debates abound, but a recommendation is to apply pragmatism to research choices while avoiding positivist post-positivism in all phases. Ethics is more than statements and platitudes, with ethics-in-action creating a continuous, open dialogue. Interviews are the most common method for data collection in qualitative research, but researchers often lack a systematic method to create interview protocols. Themes can be improved by systematic development across many levels, with models that recognize the rhizomatic and complex nature of most phenomena. Researchers should consider the Kantian notions of canon and organon, embracing a hermeneutical perspective. Trustworthiness and credibility should be considered from the start and challenged in each phase of research. Rigor and relevance result from systematicity, utility, relevance and representativeness, normotoxicity, and data-driven results and processes. Artificial intelligence (AI) must move front and center as a key component of all research phases. Beyond the norms and expectations of the researcher, academia, and the audience, qualitative research can showcase the multivocality of participants to improve validity and reliability.