While anatomists, globally, are working to improve inclusive practice, the unique challenges faced by this discipline can form a barrier to sustained progress. This chapter explores the critical importance of representative research practices in anatomy, discussing its principles, challenges, and implementation strategies. Examining the historical context of exclusion and bias in anatomical studies highlights how past practices have shaped current inequalities, contextualising the current move towards representative research. Key topics include the evolution of inclusive practices in anatomy curricula, barriers to implementing representative research (such as institutional constraints and implicit biases), and practical guidance on conducting representative research, including participant recruitment and data analysis. A case study on demographic data collection emphasises the complexities of identity categorisation. The chapter presents frameworks for evaluating the inclusivity of research practices and offers concrete suggestions for incorporating representative approaches into various teaching modalities. It explores the integration of representative research principles into anatomy education through the research-teaching nexus, mapping this onto established educational models like Bloom’s Taxonomy and Miller’s Pyramid. Representative research is not only an ethical imperative but also crucial for advancing anatomical knowledge and improving healthcare outcomes for diverse populations. By applying principles of representative research, anatomists can contribute to a more inclusive and equitable understanding of human anatomy. The authors hope that by providing both theoretical context and practical advice, this chapter serves as a practical guide for anatomists seeking to adopt more inclusive and equitable practices in their work.