Israel’s courtroom journalists have been condemned in public discourse quite often over the past decade. Public figures facing criminal charges have accused these reporters of adhering to the prosecution’s narrative and breaching the presumption of innocence of the accused. Social media influencers without legal expertise routinely question the dignity and professionalism of these journalists, disseminating biased and false information over various social platforms. In this chapter I seek to analyse how courtroom journalists view their experiences and, when applicable, the difficulties involved in preserving their professional authority in the digital era while adhering to journalistic ethics. This study draws on longitudinal qualitative research comparing the findings of semi-structured interviews conducted in 2020 with 12 leading legal journalists to 40 previous interviews on this same subject conducted in 2007 and 2012. The research finds that despite a decline in the journalists’ confidence in the legal establishment, they nonetheless feel obliged to protect the rule of law in Israel from the public rage fuelled by populist politicians. However, the proximity between the court reporters and the judicial system appears to weaken the social esteem for both.