Refugee camps struggle to provide essential infrastructure amid increasing environmental, political, economic, and social pressures, exacerbated by climate change. Additionally, climate change unfolds further concern about the environmental dimension of refugee camps and their sustainability in a long-term perspective. This paper focuses on how traditional camps face challenges due to climate change and proposes solutions through sustainable urban camps. We will discuss how traditional camps contribute to environmental degradation through the comparison of two case studies, while sustainable urban camps adopt eco-friendly practices such as renewable energy and efficient waste management, reducing their environmental impact. We will compare two camps: Al Azraq refugee camp in Jordan showcases sustainable infrastructure, while Kutupalong refugee camp in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh, faces significant challenges. We will suggest that by prioritizing the well-being of displaced individuals, sustainable refugee camps might aim to meet long-term needs while promoting integration into society and the environment. This paper challenges perceptions of refugees’ environmental impact by examining influencing factors, while sustainable urban camps adopt eco-friendly practices such as renewable energy and efficient waste management, reducing their environmental impact.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Building Better Lives for Refugees: A Call for Sustainable Urban Camps (Comparative Study on Al Azraq and Kutupalong Refugee Camps)

  • Majd Abuawad,
  • Antonino Di Raimo

摘要

Refugee camps struggle to provide essential infrastructure amid increasing environmental, political, economic, and social pressures, exacerbated by climate change. Additionally, climate change unfolds further concern about the environmental dimension of refugee camps and their sustainability in a long-term perspective. This paper focuses on how traditional camps face challenges due to climate change and proposes solutions through sustainable urban camps. We will discuss how traditional camps contribute to environmental degradation through the comparison of two case studies, while sustainable urban camps adopt eco-friendly practices such as renewable energy and efficient waste management, reducing their environmental impact. We will compare two camps: Al Azraq refugee camp in Jordan showcases sustainable infrastructure, while Kutupalong refugee camp in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh, faces significant challenges. We will suggest that by prioritizing the well-being of displaced individuals, sustainable refugee camps might aim to meet long-term needs while promoting integration into society and the environment. This paper challenges perceptions of refugees’ environmental impact by examining influencing factors, while sustainable urban camps adopt eco-friendly practices such as renewable energy and efficient waste management, reducing their environmental impact.