The existence of several effective AI methods that generate realistic images has garnered significant attention in recent years. Notable generative approaches utilizing different AI techniques, including Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), style-based generators, transformers, and diffusion models, have become popular for producing high-quality and diverse images. However, while humans can naturally assess the realistic qualities of images, this task remains challenging for quantitative automatic systems. This document presents a survey of current metrics and criteria for assessing the coherence of AI-generated images in terms of realism and quality. This review highlights how the metrics for realism in generated images fall short of understanding the high coherence that is essential for creating a realistic and immersive visual experience indistinguishable from real-world scenes. This follows Moravec’s paradox, which states that tasks easy for humans, such as pattern recognition, are often difficult for computers, which proves that the search for realism metrics keeps going. Specifically, this review discusses how the coherence of generated realistic images contributes to their believability by human perception, showing various levels of structural consistency, harmony, and logical connections between elements such as texture, color, lighting, and temporal aspects to create a cohesive scene that aligns with our understanding of the real world.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Easy for Us, Complex for AI: Assessing the Coherence of Generated Realistic Images

  • Azuany Mila-Ceron,
  • Zobeida J. Guzman-Zavaleta,
  • Goben Diego Constantino-Aguirre

摘要

The existence of several effective AI methods that generate realistic images has garnered significant attention in recent years. Notable generative approaches utilizing different AI techniques, including Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), style-based generators, transformers, and diffusion models, have become popular for producing high-quality and diverse images. However, while humans can naturally assess the realistic qualities of images, this task remains challenging for quantitative automatic systems. This document presents a survey of current metrics and criteria for assessing the coherence of AI-generated images in terms of realism and quality. This review highlights how the metrics for realism in generated images fall short of understanding the high coherence that is essential for creating a realistic and immersive visual experience indistinguishable from real-world scenes. This follows Moravec’s paradox, which states that tasks easy for humans, such as pattern recognition, are often difficult for computers, which proves that the search for realism metrics keeps going. Specifically, this review discusses how the coherence of generated realistic images contributes to their believability by human perception, showing various levels of structural consistency, harmony, and logical connections between elements such as texture, color, lighting, and temporal aspects to create a cohesive scene that aligns with our understanding of the real world.