This chapter brings together cross-cutting findings from across the contributions. The chapter highlights ongoing dynamics of contained mobility across asylum governance instruments globally. The chapter further unpacks the relativisation of refugeehood, as concepts of ‘refugee’ and ‘protection’ remain contested across many jurisdictions around the world. Emerging asylum governance actors and instruments tend to relabel and reconstrue people on the move. These dynamics are underscored by the content of the GCR—while it is expressly anchored in the international protection, the GCR is silent on issues such as access to territory, the right to asylum, containment and externalisation initiatives.

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Conclusions: The Interplay Between Containment and Mobility in Asylum Governance

  • Sergio Carrera Nunez,
  • Eleni Karageorgiou,
  • Gamze Ovacik,
  • Nikolas Feith Tan

摘要

This chapter brings together cross-cutting findings from across the contributions. The chapter highlights ongoing dynamics of contained mobility across asylum governance instruments globally. The chapter further unpacks the relativisation of refugeehood, as concepts of ‘refugee’ and ‘protection’ remain contested across many jurisdictions around the world. Emerging asylum governance actors and instruments tend to relabel and reconstrue people on the move. These dynamics are underscored by the content of the GCR—while it is expressly anchored in the international protection, the GCR is silent on issues such as access to territory, the right to asylum, containment and externalisation initiatives.