Scholarlink

This study evaluates two common methods for estimating mass changes from GRACE inter-satellite observations: spherical harmonics (SH) and mass concentration (mascon) solutions. Using a numerical simulation framework, we compare their performance for single-pair GRACE-like and double-pair Bender-type missions based on global RMS of residuals and degree-dependent spectral power. The analysis focuses on gravity field recovery using global 3° equal-area mascons and SH coefficients up to degree and order (d/o) 60. Mascon parameters are converted into equivalent SH coefficients for consistent spatial and spectral comparison. Results show that mascon solutions achieve lower global RMS residuals due to spatial averaging and geophysical-based regularization, whereas SH solutions preserve high-degree spectral power but are more affected by aliasing. These findings highlight the complementary strengths of the two parameterizations in gravity field recovery.

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Intercomparison of Spherical Harmonics and Mascons for GRACE-based Mass Change Estimates

  • 章节

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年

查看全文
  • Huiyi Wu,
  • Marius Schlaak,
  • Roland Pail

摘要

This study evaluates two common methods for estimating mass changes from GRACE inter-satellite observations: spherical harmonics (SH) and mass concentration (mascon) solutions. Using a numerical simulation framework, we compare their performance for single-pair GRACE-like and double-pair Bender-type missions based on global RMS of residuals and degree-dependent spectral power. The analysis focuses on gravity field recovery using global 3° equal-area mascons and SH coefficients up to degree and order (d/o) 60. Mascon parameters are converted into equivalent SH coefficients for consistent spatial and spectral comparison. Results show that mascon solutions achieve lower global RMS residuals due to spatial averaging and geophysical-based regularization, whereas SH solutions preserve high-degree spectral power but are more affected by aliasing. These findings highlight the complementary strengths of the two parameterizations in gravity field recovery.