Study Objectives: <p>Mouth leak during continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is a common barrier to tolerability and adherence and is often managed with chinstraps. We investigated whether V̇-Com, a device that reduces inspiratory pressure by adding noncompensated resistance into the CPAP circuit, could lower the chinstrap usage rate during in-laboratory titration. Additionally, we tested the effect of V̇-Com on study abortion rate due to CPAP intolerance.</p> Methods: <p>We conducted a retrospective study of in-laboratory CPAP titrations performed at a multisite sleep center. Mouth leak was identified based on ventilator-reported leak (&gt; 30 L/min), visual observation of mouth opening, or characteristic alterations in the flow signal. V̇-Com was added as a first-line intervention when mouth leak was detected. If V̇-Com proved ineffective, it was removed, and a chinstrap was utilized. Similarly, V̇-Com was used in the attempt to salvage studies that were otherwise going to be aborted due to positive airway pressure intolerance.</p> Results: <p>Among 1,632 titrations, 190 patients (12%) experienced mouth leak and 46 individuals requested to abort their titration due to positive airway pressure intolerance (3%). V̇-Com reduced the chinstrap usage rate by 68% and the study abortion rate by 91%. In sensitivity analysis modeling hypothetical placebo response rates, the number needed to treat to avoid chinstrap use in 1 additional participant remained as low as 5, even under conservative assumptions.</p> Conclusions: <p>V̇-Com was associated with reduced chinstrap use and fewer aborted studies during CPAP titration. This suggests that V̇-Com may serve as a useful tool to improve pressure tolerance and leak management.</p> Citation: <p>Messineo L, Keasling C, Hughes B, et&#xa0;al. The impact of V̇-Com on chinstrap usage and study completion rates during CPAP titration. <i>J Clin Sleep Med</i>. 2025;21(12):2121–2127.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The impact of V̇-Com on chinstrap usage and study completion rates during CPAP titration

  • Ludovico Messineo,
  • Carmen Keasling,
  • Bryan Hughes,
  • Bernard Hete,
  • Gabriel Tallent,
  • Robert J. Farney,
  • William H. Noah

摘要

Study Objectives:

Mouth leak during continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is a common barrier to tolerability and adherence and is often managed with chinstraps. We investigated whether V̇-Com, a device that reduces inspiratory pressure by adding noncompensated resistance into the CPAP circuit, could lower the chinstrap usage rate during in-laboratory titration. Additionally, we tested the effect of V̇-Com on study abortion rate due to CPAP intolerance.

Methods:

We conducted a retrospective study of in-laboratory CPAP titrations performed at a multisite sleep center. Mouth leak was identified based on ventilator-reported leak (> 30 L/min), visual observation of mouth opening, or characteristic alterations in the flow signal. V̇-Com was added as a first-line intervention when mouth leak was detected. If V̇-Com proved ineffective, it was removed, and a chinstrap was utilized. Similarly, V̇-Com was used in the attempt to salvage studies that were otherwise going to be aborted due to positive airway pressure intolerance.

Results:

Among 1,632 titrations, 190 patients (12%) experienced mouth leak and 46 individuals requested to abort their titration due to positive airway pressure intolerance (3%). V̇-Com reduced the chinstrap usage rate by 68% and the study abortion rate by 91%. In sensitivity analysis modeling hypothetical placebo response rates, the number needed to treat to avoid chinstrap use in 1 additional participant remained as low as 5, even under conservative assumptions.

Conclusions:

V̇-Com was associated with reduced chinstrap use and fewer aborted studies during CPAP titration. This suggests that V̇-Com may serve as a useful tool to improve pressure tolerance and leak management.

Citation:

Messineo L, Keasling C, Hughes B, et al. The impact of V̇-Com on chinstrap usage and study completion rates during CPAP titration. J Clin Sleep Med. 2025;21(12):2121–2127.