<p>This study aims to address the existing concerns for mediation meta-analysis (MMA) conducted under pretest–posttest-control-group (PPCG) designs. These issues include the validity of meta-analytic structural equation modeling with a binary independent variable, heterogeneously defined treatment doses, and potential violations of the homogeneous variance assumption. Moreover, an open question remains regarding whether effect sizes in MMA over PPCG designs should be computed from posttest scores (PSMMA) or from pretest–posttest change scores (CSMMA). This study employs theoretical discussions and Monte Carlo simulations to demonstrate the feasibility of MMA under PPCG designs and to compare CSMMA and PSMMA. Furthermore, the procedures for computing effect sizes are summarized, and an empirical example is presented.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Synthesizing data from pretest–posttest-control-group designs in mediation meta-analysis

  • Zhiming Lu,
  • Zijun Ke,
  • Rebecca Y. M. Cheung,
  • Qian Zhang

摘要

This study aims to address the existing concerns for mediation meta-analysis (MMA) conducted under pretest–posttest-control-group (PPCG) designs. These issues include the validity of meta-analytic structural equation modeling with a binary independent variable, heterogeneously defined treatment doses, and potential violations of the homogeneous variance assumption. Moreover, an open question remains regarding whether effect sizes in MMA over PPCG designs should be computed from posttest scores (PSMMA) or from pretest–posttest change scores (CSMMA). This study employs theoretical discussions and Monte Carlo simulations to demonstrate the feasibility of MMA under PPCG designs and to compare CSMMA and PSMMA. Furthermore, the procedures for computing effect sizes are summarized, and an empirical example is presented.