<p>Effect of triethanolamine and sulfate carriers on sulfate balance of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and metakaolin blended cement (MKC) was investigated through calorimetry, compressive strength, XRD and pore solution analysis. Results show that anhydrite is better than hemihydrate for OPC to achieve sulfate balance with the addition of triethanolamine, while the opposite phenomenon is found for MKC. In OPC, fast dissolution of hemihydrate promotes the formation of ettringite, which in turn can consume hemihydrate rapidly and not have enough SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> left to passivate the hydration of aluminate-containing phase. While anhydrite can continuously supply SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> to maintain sulfate balance due to its low dissolution rate. In MKC, SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> released from hemihydrate can be adsorbed on MK’s surface instead of forming ettringite, leading MK to become another sulfate source to maintain sulfate balance after the depletion of hemihydrate. The activated MK’s dissolution by triethanolamine and slow supply of SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> from anhydrite benefit ettringite’s formation, leaving fewer SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup> for adsorption, which makes anhydrite less effective than hemihydrate to maintain sulfate balance.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Interactive effect of sulfate carrier and triethanolamine on the sulfate balance of metakaolin blended cement

  • Zichen Lu,
  • Zhiwei Liu,
  • Liheng Zhang,
  • Lingbo Wang,
  • Zhenping Sun

摘要

Effect of triethanolamine and sulfate carriers on sulfate balance of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and metakaolin blended cement (MKC) was investigated through calorimetry, compressive strength, XRD and pore solution analysis. Results show that anhydrite is better than hemihydrate for OPC to achieve sulfate balance with the addition of triethanolamine, while the opposite phenomenon is found for MKC. In OPC, fast dissolution of hemihydrate promotes the formation of ettringite, which in turn can consume hemihydrate rapidly and not have enough SO42− left to passivate the hydration of aluminate-containing phase. While anhydrite can continuously supply SO42− to maintain sulfate balance due to its low dissolution rate. In MKC, SO42− released from hemihydrate can be adsorbed on MK’s surface instead of forming ettringite, leading MK to become another sulfate source to maintain sulfate balance after the depletion of hemihydrate. The activated MK’s dissolution by triethanolamine and slow supply of SO42− from anhydrite benefit ettringite’s formation, leaving fewer SO42− for adsorption, which makes anhydrite less effective than hemihydrate to maintain sulfate balance.