Scholarlink

<p>The article compares cybersecurity architectures in three European countries—Germany, France and Poland—pointing out differences resulting from state structures and cybersecurity management models. The authors argue that despite the common framework resulting from EU and NATO membership, the degree of centralization in each country significantly shapes organizational solutions in the area of cybersecurity. The analysis shows that Germany uses a&#xa0;decentralized and federal model, which may increase redundancy but could hinder coordination and responsiveness. France relies on a&#xa0;highly centralized structure with ANSSI as the leading body, which promotes rapid response but creates the risk of a&#xa0;single point of failure. Poland, on the other hand, has adopted a&#xa0;hybrid solution with three CSIRTs, enabling the division of responsibilities but requiring efficient cross-sector cooperation. The article allows for a&#xa0;systematic comparison of cyber architectures and provides a&#xa0;basis for further empirical research on their effectiveness, interoperability and harmonization of European cybersecurity standards.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Eine Typologie nationaler Cybersicherheitsarchitekturen: Cyberarchitekturmodelle von Deutschland, Frankreich und Polen im Vergleich

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月26日

查看全文
  • Lena-Sophie Drews,
  • Mateusz Łabuz

摘要

The article compares cybersecurity architectures in three European countries—Germany, France and Poland—pointing out differences resulting from state structures and cybersecurity management models. The authors argue that despite the common framework resulting from EU and NATO membership, the degree of centralization in each country significantly shapes organizational solutions in the area of cybersecurity. The analysis shows that Germany uses a decentralized and federal model, which may increase redundancy but could hinder coordination and responsiveness. France relies on a highly centralized structure with ANSSI as the leading body, which promotes rapid response but creates the risk of a single point of failure. Poland, on the other hand, has adopted a hybrid solution with three CSIRTs, enabling the division of responsibilities but requiring efficient cross-sector cooperation. The article allows for a systematic comparison of cyber architectures and provides a basis for further empirical research on their effectiveness, interoperability and harmonization of European cybersecurity standards.