Scholarlink

Background <p>Sustaining the benefits of externally funded interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains a concern in global health. As many initiatives depend on time-limited official development assistance (ODA) or philanthropic funding, exit strategies are increasingly recognised as key to ensuring positive impact. This systematic review examines how exit strategies have been conceptualised and implemented across a range of global health initiatives. We aim to identify, categorise and analyse the components of exit strategies during or after the implementation of health interventions in LMICs and their effectiveness. The results of this review will inform future global health programme design and research, including mental health.</p> Methods <p>Database searches were conducted in Embase, Scopus, PubMed, PsycINFO (Elsevier), HMIC Health Management Information Consortium, MEDLINE, Social Policy and Practice, Web of Science and Global Health. The latest searches were run in January 2023. Data on study characteristics were descriptively synthesised. Extracted data regarding exit strategy processes and components were analysed using thematic synthesis.</p> Results <p>Twenty-three articles (reflecting 22 studies) were identified for inclusion. Within these, eight key components of successful exit strategies were identified: (1) shared principles and values, (2) resource stability, (3) operational linkages, (4) local champions, (5) staff care and capacity, (6) leadership promotion, (7) mentoring and evaluation and (8) context-sensitive flexibility of exit. The studies showcased the complexity and interdependent nature of exit strategies in varied health contexts and provided insights into effective processes for sustained implementation.</p> Conclusions <p>This review highlights the importance of planning for sustainability from the outset of health programmes in LMICs. The application of effective, contextually adaptive exit strategies is critical to ensuring the continuity of health gains after external support ends. It emphasises the need for collaborative research focused on long-term impacts and offers concrete recommendations for policy and practice.</p> Systematic Review Registration <p>PROSPERO CRD42021236969.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Exit strategies for health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月21日

查看全文
  • Maria Milenova,
  • S’thembile Thusini,
  • Petra C. Gronholm,
  • Tatiana Taylor Salisbury

摘要

Background

Sustaining the benefits of externally funded interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains a concern in global health. As many initiatives depend on time-limited official development assistance (ODA) or philanthropic funding, exit strategies are increasingly recognised as key to ensuring positive impact. This systematic review examines how exit strategies have been conceptualised and implemented across a range of global health initiatives. We aim to identify, categorise and analyse the components of exit strategies during or after the implementation of health interventions in LMICs and their effectiveness. The results of this review will inform future global health programme design and research, including mental health.

Methods

Database searches were conducted in Embase, Scopus, PubMed, PsycINFO (Elsevier), HMIC Health Management Information Consortium, MEDLINE, Social Policy and Practice, Web of Science and Global Health. The latest searches were run in January 2023. Data on study characteristics were descriptively synthesised. Extracted data regarding exit strategy processes and components were analysed using thematic synthesis.

Results

Twenty-three articles (reflecting 22 studies) were identified for inclusion. Within these, eight key components of successful exit strategies were identified: (1) shared principles and values, (2) resource stability, (3) operational linkages, (4) local champions, (5) staff care and capacity, (6) leadership promotion, (7) mentoring and evaluation and (8) context-sensitive flexibility of exit. The studies showcased the complexity and interdependent nature of exit strategies in varied health contexts and provided insights into effective processes for sustained implementation.

Conclusions

This review highlights the importance of planning for sustainability from the outset of health programmes in LMICs. The application of effective, contextually adaptive exit strategies is critical to ensuring the continuity of health gains after external support ends. It emphasises the need for collaborative research focused on long-term impacts and offers concrete recommendations for policy and practice.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO CRD42021236969.