Scholarlink

Background <p>In the USA, many states, including Colorado, have increased criminal penalties for illicit opioid possession, which may alter overdose risk. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between Colorado’s increased drug-related criminal legal penalties, risk of overdose, and substance use patterns.</p> Methods <p>We used concept mapping — a mixed-methods approach used to develop a conceptual understanding of an issue from a community lens — to engage with people with living and/or lived experience with the criminal legal system, substance use, and/or overdose, their loved ones, and service providers. In facilitated discussion, we used the prompt: “Do you see overdose and substance use, in Colorado, being impacted by an individual's involvement with the criminal legal system?” Participants — recruited from community-based organizations — identified, rated, sorted, and categorized factors affecting criminal legal involvement, substance use, and/or overdose in their community. We used <i>groupwisdom</i> to develop concept maps and to analyze findings.</p> Results <p>Twenty-four individuals (ages 18–70) participated; most had living and/or lived experience. Participants identified 100 distinct factors, which were sorted into 9 clusters: societal impacts of criminal legal involvement, lifesaving benefits to decreased criminal legal penalties, environmental barriers of criminal legal involvement, structural barriers to recovery services, essential culturally aware community-based services, strategic allocation of funding, strategies to improve law enforcement’s impact, changing policies to keep law enforcement accountable and better educate law enforcement on community culture, and community issues with law enforcement to prioritize. Of the 40 most influential and common factors, most related to structural impacts of criminal legal involvement and barriers to recovery (e.g., long waitlists, job loss).</p> Conclusions <p>Using concept mapping, we worked with community members to identify and prioritize factors associated with substance use and overdose amidst increasing drug-related criminal legal penalties. These insights (e.g., law enforcement’s role should be acting as a bridge to mental health and recovery services) are critical for policymakers and service providers, as they speak to the need for investing in re-entry services, harm reduction services, and co-responder models for behavioral health crises.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Criminal legal penalties, substance use, and overdose: a concept mapping study examining Colorado’s criminal legal penalties

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年1月2日

查看全文
  • Katherine LeMasters,
  • Samantha K. Nall,
  • Cole Jurecka,
  • Betsy Craft,
  • Paul J. Christine,
  • Ryan Goodman,
  • Jessie Henderson,
  • Robert Haywood-James,
  • Angela Williams,
  • Grace Wittner,
  • Joshua A. Barocas

摘要

Background

In the USA, many states, including Colorado, have increased criminal penalties for illicit opioid possession, which may alter overdose risk. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between Colorado’s increased drug-related criminal legal penalties, risk of overdose, and substance use patterns.

Methods

We used concept mapping — a mixed-methods approach used to develop a conceptual understanding of an issue from a community lens — to engage with people with living and/or lived experience with the criminal legal system, substance use, and/or overdose, their loved ones, and service providers. In facilitated discussion, we used the prompt: “Do you see overdose and substance use, in Colorado, being impacted by an individual's involvement with the criminal legal system?” Participants — recruited from community-based organizations — identified, rated, sorted, and categorized factors affecting criminal legal involvement, substance use, and/or overdose in their community. We used groupwisdom to develop concept maps and to analyze findings.

Results

Twenty-four individuals (ages 18–70) participated; most had living and/or lived experience. Participants identified 100 distinct factors, which were sorted into 9 clusters: societal impacts of criminal legal involvement, lifesaving benefits to decreased criminal legal penalties, environmental barriers of criminal legal involvement, structural barriers to recovery services, essential culturally aware community-based services, strategic allocation of funding, strategies to improve law enforcement’s impact, changing policies to keep law enforcement accountable and better educate law enforcement on community culture, and community issues with law enforcement to prioritize. Of the 40 most influential and common factors, most related to structural impacts of criminal legal involvement and barriers to recovery (e.g., long waitlists, job loss).

Conclusions

Using concept mapping, we worked with community members to identify and prioritize factors associated with substance use and overdose amidst increasing drug-related criminal legal penalties. These insights (e.g., law enforcement’s role should be acting as a bridge to mental health and recovery services) are critical for policymakers and service providers, as they speak to the need for investing in re-entry services, harm reduction services, and co-responder models for behavioral health crises.