Scholarlink

Background <p>In an era of unprecedented technology growth, many health and support services are now accessed through web content, creating both new opportunities and barriers for people with disabilities. Web-use requires communication skills, which can be problematic for people with aphasia (language/communication impairment). This study, the first stage of the ‘Bridging the Digital Divide’ project, aimed to explore experiences of web-use, identify priorities for improving access, and identify corresponding human-centred design principles.</p> Methods <p>Experience-based co-design and human-centred design approaches were used. Focus groups were held with people with aphasia (<i>n</i> = 9), family members (<i>n</i> = 8), and health professionals (<i>n</i> = 10). Each focus group had two sequential phases: an experience-gathering discussion and a structured prioritisation activity. Participants shared their experiences of accessing healthcare, information, and support services online. Reflexive thematic analysis was applied to the experience data, touchpoints were identified, and findings were synthesised into a generalised experience map organised around six components of Internet use. Priorities for improving web accessibility were established using the nominal group technique. Each stakeholder group generated and ranked priorities, which were subsequently pooled across groups and analysed using qualitative content analysis. Key priorities were mapped to human-centred design principles to guide future co-design.</p> Results <p>Experience data produced six themes: (1) Aphasia-aware design, (2) Confidence building through support and practice, (3) Challenges to online service access, (4) Searching is hard when you can’t find the right words, (5) Written information online is overwhelming, and (6) Finding new ways to connect with peers. Priorities for improving web accessibility included greater access to learning and support resources, new technology and tools, communication-accessible design, inclusive and tailored technology, and help from a real person. These priorities were linked to four design principles: (1) Simple language, (2) Simple interface, (3) User customisation, and (4) Development of training materials and resources.</p> Conclusion <p>People with aphasia experience challenges accessing services and information online. New and tailored technology, and awareness of communication-accessible design, were identified as priorities for improving access. These findings will be used to iteratively co-design and develop a web-browser extension in the next stage of research.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Co-design of a web accessibility browser extension for people with post-stroke aphasia: Understanding experiences and priorities in the first stage of an experience-based co-design study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月22日

查看全文
  • Jennifer Lee,
  • Peter Worthy,
  • Ryan Deslandes,
  • Bridget Burton,
  • David A. Copland,
  • Phill Jamieson,
  • Kim Barron,
  • Kirstine Shrubsole,
  • Leanne Togher,
  • Annie J. Hill,
  • Janet Wiles,
  • S. Alexander Haslam,
  • Sarah J. Wallace

摘要

Background

In an era of unprecedented technology growth, many health and support services are now accessed through web content, creating both new opportunities and barriers for people with disabilities. Web-use requires communication skills, which can be problematic for people with aphasia (language/communication impairment). This study, the first stage of the ‘Bridging the Digital Divide’ project, aimed to explore experiences of web-use, identify priorities for improving access, and identify corresponding human-centred design principles.

Methods

Experience-based co-design and human-centred design approaches were used. Focus groups were held with people with aphasia (n = 9), family members (n = 8), and health professionals (n = 10). Each focus group had two sequential phases: an experience-gathering discussion and a structured prioritisation activity. Participants shared their experiences of accessing healthcare, information, and support services online. Reflexive thematic analysis was applied to the experience data, touchpoints were identified, and findings were synthesised into a generalised experience map organised around six components of Internet use. Priorities for improving web accessibility were established using the nominal group technique. Each stakeholder group generated and ranked priorities, which were subsequently pooled across groups and analysed using qualitative content analysis. Key priorities were mapped to human-centred design principles to guide future co-design.

Results

Experience data produced six themes: (1) Aphasia-aware design, (2) Confidence building through support and practice, (3) Challenges to online service access, (4) Searching is hard when you can’t find the right words, (5) Written information online is overwhelming, and (6) Finding new ways to connect with peers. Priorities for improving web accessibility included greater access to learning and support resources, new technology and tools, communication-accessible design, inclusive and tailored technology, and help from a real person. These priorities were linked to four design principles: (1) Simple language, (2) Simple interface, (3) User customisation, and (4) Development of training materials and resources.

Conclusion

People with aphasia experience challenges accessing services and information online. New and tailored technology, and awareness of communication-accessible design, were identified as priorities for improving access. These findings will be used to iteratively co-design and develop a web-browser extension in the next stage of research.