Scholarlink

<p>Pore-scale microplastics (&lt; 10&#xa0;μm) are emerging contaminants whose behavior and fate in aquatic environments remain poorly understood. While the transport and retention of spherical microplastics (SMPs) have been studied in fluvial systems, irregularly shaped microplastics (IMPs) and microplastic fibers (MPFs) remain poorly understood. This study investigates how IMPs and MPFs differ from SMPs in their transport and retention in open stream and hyporheic flows under controlled flume conditions using fluorescently labeled particles. We compared the transport dynamics of IMPs (d90 = 7.68&#xa0;μm) and MPFs (diameter 5–10&#xa0;μm, length 60–250&#xa0;μm) with reference SMPs (1, 3, and 10&#xa0;μm in diameter) by continuously monitoring microplastic concentrations in surface water and streambed sediments. IMPs exhibited mobility similar to SMPs, with minor retention in the system. In contrast, MPFs showed markedly higher retention, preferentially accumulating at the sediment–water interface, where ~ 9% of the introduced mass was retained. These findings demonstrate that particle shape and aspect ratio strongly influence microplastic transport and retention in fluvial systems, with implications for their ecological impacts and long-term fate.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Mobility and retention of microplastic fibers and irregular plastic fragments in fluvial systems: an experimental flume study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月26日

查看全文
  • Marco La Capra,
  • Daniel Wagner,
  • Seema Agarwal,
  • Jan H. Fleckenstein,
  • Sven Frei

摘要

Pore-scale microplastics (< 10 μm) are emerging contaminants whose behavior and fate in aquatic environments remain poorly understood. While the transport and retention of spherical microplastics (SMPs) have been studied in fluvial systems, irregularly shaped microplastics (IMPs) and microplastic fibers (MPFs) remain poorly understood. This study investigates how IMPs and MPFs differ from SMPs in their transport and retention in open stream and hyporheic flows under controlled flume conditions using fluorescently labeled particles. We compared the transport dynamics of IMPs (d90 = 7.68 μm) and MPFs (diameter 5–10 μm, length 60–250 μm) with reference SMPs (1, 3, and 10 μm in diameter) by continuously monitoring microplastic concentrations in surface water and streambed sediments. IMPs exhibited mobility similar to SMPs, with minor retention in the system. In contrast, MPFs showed markedly higher retention, preferentially accumulating at the sediment–water interface, where ~ 9% of the introduced mass was retained. These findings demonstrate that particle shape and aspect ratio strongly influence microplastic transport and retention in fluvial systems, with implications for their ecological impacts and long-term fate.