Objective <p>1. To develop a scoring system for the GCA Disease Activity 2. To validate the composite of the GCA Disease Activity Score (GCA-DAS). 3. To assess the GCA-DAS feasibility and effectiveness in the routine clinical setting for monitoring and assessment of treatment outcomes of GCA.</p> Methods <p>The developed GCA-DAS includes acute temporal headache, visual deficit, physician global assessment of disease activity, patient global assessment of well-being, and ESR, rated on 0–10 scale. These variables have been identified as the main GCA outcome measures and criteria for improvement. Validation analyses were conducted on 124 patients and included assessment of construct validity, discriminant validity, and responsiveness to change.</p> Results <p>The GCA-DAS was found to hold face and content validity, good construct validity, satisfactory internal consistency, appropriate dimensional structure, fair discriminative validity and strong responsiveness to clinically important change over time. The devised GCA-DAS was feasible and easily recorded in standard practice. This has been supported by the parallel significant improvement in the patients’ functional ability (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and patient satisfaction (86.3%).</p> Conclusion <p>The GCA-DAS was found to be a valid instrument for assessment of GCA disease activity and is potentially applicable in standard clinical care, observational studies, and clinical trials.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Measuring disease activity in giant cell arteritis: development and initial validation of a composite disease activity score

  • Yasser El Miedany,
  • Maha Elgaafary,
  • Mathias Toth,
  • Deborah Palmer,
  • Sami Bahlas,
  • Safaa Mahran,
  • Mohamed Hassan Abu Zaid,
  • Waleed Hassan,
  • Rahma A. Elziaty,
  • Samar Abd Alhamed Tabra,
  • Walaa Elwakil

摘要

Objective

1. To develop a scoring system for the GCA Disease Activity 2. To validate the composite of the GCA Disease Activity Score (GCA-DAS). 3. To assess the GCA-DAS feasibility and effectiveness in the routine clinical setting for monitoring and assessment of treatment outcomes of GCA.

Methods

The developed GCA-DAS includes acute temporal headache, visual deficit, physician global assessment of disease activity, patient global assessment of well-being, and ESR, rated on 0–10 scale. These variables have been identified as the main GCA outcome measures and criteria for improvement. Validation analyses were conducted on 124 patients and included assessment of construct validity, discriminant validity, and responsiveness to change.

Results

The GCA-DAS was found to hold face and content validity, good construct validity, satisfactory internal consistency, appropriate dimensional structure, fair discriminative validity and strong responsiveness to clinically important change over time. The devised GCA-DAS was feasible and easily recorded in standard practice. This has been supported by the parallel significant improvement in the patients’ functional ability (p < 0.001) and patient satisfaction (86.3%).

Conclusion

The GCA-DAS was found to be a valid instrument for assessment of GCA disease activity and is potentially applicable in standard clinical care, observational studies, and clinical trials.