Background <p>Accurate and timely diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is of utmost importance. Although synovial alpha-defensin has shown potential as a biomarker, recent studies have questioned its additional benefit over traditional synovial biomarkers and advised against its routine use. The primary objective is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the alpha-defensin immunoassay in PJI. Secondary objectives include comparing its diagnostic accuracy against traditional biomarkers and assessing our results in the context of existing research to provide a solid perspective on its clinical utility.</p> Methods <p>This is a prospective cohort study. Synovial samples were obtained at the time of revision arthroplasty or from painful arthroplasties. A complete laboratory workup was performed, including CBC, ESR, CRP, WBCs count. Synovial samples were analyzed for leucocytic count, PMN percentage, leucocyte esterase, and alpha-defensin immunoassay. Culture and sensitivity, and histopathology were also done. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were classified into septic and aseptic according to MSIS criteria.</p> Results <p>Ninety joints met our inclusion criteria. Alpha-defensin immunoassay was positive in 36 joints and negative in 54 joints, with 1 false positive and 3 false negatives, resulting in a sensitivity of 92.11% (95% CI, 78.62–98.34%), a specificity of 98.08% (95% CI, 89.74–99.95%), positive predictive value (PPV) of 49.43% (95% CI, 12.28–87.22%), negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.84% (95% CI, 99.52–99.94%) and diagnostic accuracy of 97.96% (95% CI, 92.48–99.78%). The optimal cutoff was 9.2, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.945.</p> Conclusions <p>While the alpha defensin immunoassay is not recommended to be used routinely as a screening method for PJI, its high specificity and NPV make it a valuable addition to traditional blood and synovial parameters in the diagnosis of complex hip and knee PJI, particularly for ruling out infection.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Alpha defensin immunoassay is more effective for ruling out rather than diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI): a prospective cohort study

  • Mohammad Kamal Abdelnasser,
  • Ayat Bakhet,
  • Amal Hosni,
  • Dalia Tarik Kamal,
  • Osama Bakr Osman,
  • Mohammed Anter Abdelhameed,
  • Mohamed MA Moustafa

摘要

Background

Accurate and timely diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is of utmost importance. Although synovial alpha-defensin has shown potential as a biomarker, recent studies have questioned its additional benefit over traditional synovial biomarkers and advised against its routine use. The primary objective is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the alpha-defensin immunoassay in PJI. Secondary objectives include comparing its diagnostic accuracy against traditional biomarkers and assessing our results in the context of existing research to provide a solid perspective on its clinical utility.

Methods

This is a prospective cohort study. Synovial samples were obtained at the time of revision arthroplasty or from painful arthroplasties. A complete laboratory workup was performed, including CBC, ESR, CRP, WBCs count. Synovial samples were analyzed for leucocytic count, PMN percentage, leucocyte esterase, and alpha-defensin immunoassay. Culture and sensitivity, and histopathology were also done. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were classified into septic and aseptic according to MSIS criteria.

Results

Ninety joints met our inclusion criteria. Alpha-defensin immunoassay was positive in 36 joints and negative in 54 joints, with 1 false positive and 3 false negatives, resulting in a sensitivity of 92.11% (95% CI, 78.62–98.34%), a specificity of 98.08% (95% CI, 89.74–99.95%), positive predictive value (PPV) of 49.43% (95% CI, 12.28–87.22%), negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.84% (95% CI, 99.52–99.94%) and diagnostic accuracy of 97.96% (95% CI, 92.48–99.78%). The optimal cutoff was 9.2, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.945.

Conclusions

While the alpha defensin immunoassay is not recommended to be used routinely as a screening method for PJI, its high specificity and NPV make it a valuable addition to traditional blood and synovial parameters in the diagnosis of complex hip and knee PJI, particularly for ruling out infection.