Background <p>The immune response and safety using different COVID-19 vaccine platforms in patients with immune mediated rheumatic diseases is still uncertain. The objective of this study is to compare the immunogenicity and safety after two doses of BNT162b2, CoronaVac and ChadOx-1 in SLE patients.</p> Methods <p>Prospective study including SLE patients who received a primary schedule to COVID-19 vaccination between May and August 2021. Immunogenicity, events supposedly attributable to vaccination or immunization (ESAVI) and disease activity were assessed at baseline and after each vaccine dose.</p> Results <p>121 SLE patients were included in the cohort, 88 in the immunogenicity analysis and 118 in the safety analysis. The groups were homogenous concerning sex, age, and comorbidities. Seropositivity after two doses of vaccines was similar between CoronaVac (68%), ChadOx1 (80,6%) and BNT162b2 (88%) (p=0.231). However, CoronaVac and ChadOx-1 presented lower titers in comparison with BNT162b2.&#xa0; Regarding ESAVI, the most frequent reported following first and second vaccine doses were, respectively: injection site pain (65.2%/41.1%), headache (50.9%/29.9%) and arthralgia (37.5%/22.5%). Fever and myalgia were more related to ChAdOx1 than CoronaVac (23.3 vs. 5.0%; p=0.025). There was no difference in MEX-SLEDAI between vaccine platforms. No serious ESAVI were reported.</p> Conclusion <p>After two doses, the three COVID-19 vaccine platforms induced a significant increase in antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2. Patients who received BNT162b2 exhibited a higher serological response compared to the other vaccines. All three vaccine platforms demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with no serious ESAVI or worsening of disease activity.</p> Clinical trial Number <p>The study was registered in The Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC) in 04/14/2021 with code RBR-108fyykd.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Comparison of the immunogenicity and safety among COVID-19 vaccines ChadOx-1, CoronaVac and BNT162b2 in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients: a prospective cohort

  • Priscila Dias Cardoso Ribeiro,
  • Flavia Maria Matos Melo Campos Peixoto,
  • Edgard Torres dos Reis-Neto,
  • Gecilmara Salviato Pileggi,
  • Nancy Cristina Junqueira Bellei,
  • Marcelo de Medeiros Pinheiro,
  • Vanessa de Oliveira Magalhães,
  • Erika Biegelmeyer,
  • André Gustavo Cunha Trolese,
  • Alexandre Wagner Silva de Souza,
  • Cristiane Kayser,
  • Valéria Valim,
  • Ketty Lysie Libardi Lira Machado,
  • Maressa Barbosa Beloni Lirio,
  • Juliana Ribeiro de Oliveira,
  • Andrea Teixeira de Carvalho,
  • Rodrigo Poubel Vieira de Rezende,
  • Ana Karla Guedes de Melo,
  • Rejane Maria Rodrigues de Abreu Vieira,
  • Vitor Alve Cruz,
  • Viviane Angelina de Souza,
  • Gilda Aparecida Ferreira,
  • Sandra Lúcia Euzébio Ribeiro,
  • Odirlei Monticielo,
  • Ricardo Machado Xavier,
  • Natalia Sarzi Sartori,
  • Emilia Inoue Sato

摘要

Background

The immune response and safety using different COVID-19 vaccine platforms in patients with immune mediated rheumatic diseases is still uncertain. The objective of this study is to compare the immunogenicity and safety after two doses of BNT162b2, CoronaVac and ChadOx-1 in SLE patients.

Methods

Prospective study including SLE patients who received a primary schedule to COVID-19 vaccination between May and August 2021. Immunogenicity, events supposedly attributable to vaccination or immunization (ESAVI) and disease activity were assessed at baseline and after each vaccine dose.

Results

121 SLE patients were included in the cohort, 88 in the immunogenicity analysis and 118 in the safety analysis. The groups were homogenous concerning sex, age, and comorbidities. Seropositivity after two doses of vaccines was similar between CoronaVac (68%), ChadOx1 (80,6%) and BNT162b2 (88%) (p=0.231). However, CoronaVac and ChadOx-1 presented lower titers in comparison with BNT162b2.  Regarding ESAVI, the most frequent reported following first and second vaccine doses were, respectively: injection site pain (65.2%/41.1%), headache (50.9%/29.9%) and arthralgia (37.5%/22.5%). Fever and myalgia were more related to ChAdOx1 than CoronaVac (23.3 vs. 5.0%; p=0.025). There was no difference in MEX-SLEDAI between vaccine platforms. No serious ESAVI were reported.

Conclusion

After two doses, the three COVID-19 vaccine platforms induced a significant increase in antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2. Patients who received BNT162b2 exhibited a higher serological response compared to the other vaccines. All three vaccine platforms demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with no serious ESAVI or worsening of disease activity.

Clinical trial Number

The study was registered in The Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC) in 04/14/2021 with code RBR-108fyykd.