Scholarlink

Introduction <p>Ameloglyphics, the study of enamel rod-end patterns, or "tooth prints," has emerged as a promising forensic tool. Its application in human identification is documented, but data on comparative morphology across human and non-human mammalian species remain limited. Differentiating the species is crucial in forensic contexts such as mass disasters, wildlife forensics, and anthropological investigations.</p> Aim &amp; objective <p>This study aimed to observe and compare the ameloglyphic patterns of human and selected non-human mammals, hypothesising that species-specific enamel rod-end configurations exist and can be digitally analysed for identification.</p> Materials &amp; methods <p>A total of 163 extracted permanent teeth were collected, comprising 51 humans (Homo sapiens), 22 dogs (Canis lupus familiaris), 15 cats (Felis catus), 25 goats (Capra aegagrus hircus), 46 cows &amp; calves (Bos taurus), and 4 buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). The coronal segments of all teeth were acid etched, and examined under stereomicroscope to analyse the tooth print. Statistical analysis was conducted using chi-square test, and biometric analysis was performed with Verifinger Standard SDK v4.5 software.</p> Result <p>Three primary core patterns, along with seventeen distinct sub-patterns, were identified and classified. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of identification of these patterns was also assessed using Cohen’s kappa statistics.These patterns were observed either independently or in combination, exhibiting statistically significant variations in their distribution across different tooth types and species.</p> Conclusion <p>Biometric analysis confirmed tooth- and species-specific uniqueness of enamel rod-end patterns, demonstrating the potential of ameloglyphics for interspecies differentiation with wide forensic applications like anthropology, wildlife forensics and forensic identification.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Ameloglyphics: a novel forensic tool for species identification and individual characterisation

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月11日

查看全文
  • Somya Soin,
  • Hardi Mendpara

摘要

Introduction

Ameloglyphics, the study of enamel rod-end patterns, or "tooth prints," has emerged as a promising forensic tool. Its application in human identification is documented, but data on comparative morphology across human and non-human mammalian species remain limited. Differentiating the species is crucial in forensic contexts such as mass disasters, wildlife forensics, and anthropological investigations.

Aim & objective

This study aimed to observe and compare the ameloglyphic patterns of human and selected non-human mammals, hypothesising that species-specific enamel rod-end configurations exist and can be digitally analysed for identification.

Materials & methods

A total of 163 extracted permanent teeth were collected, comprising 51 humans (Homo sapiens), 22 dogs (Canis lupus familiaris), 15 cats (Felis catus), 25 goats (Capra aegagrus hircus), 46 cows & calves (Bos taurus), and 4 buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). The coronal segments of all teeth were acid etched, and examined under stereomicroscope to analyse the tooth print. Statistical analysis was conducted using chi-square test, and biometric analysis was performed with Verifinger Standard SDK v4.5 software.

Result

Three primary core patterns, along with seventeen distinct sub-patterns, were identified and classified. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of identification of these patterns was also assessed using Cohen’s kappa statistics.These patterns were observed either independently or in combination, exhibiting statistically significant variations in their distribution across different tooth types and species.

Conclusion

Biometric analysis confirmed tooth- and species-specific uniqueness of enamel rod-end patterns, demonstrating the potential of ameloglyphics for interspecies differentiation with wide forensic applications like anthropology, wildlife forensics and forensic identification.