Background <p>Concentric macular rings (CMR) and Henle fiber layer (HFL) corrugations, potential clinical biomarkers of foveal hypoplasia, have been observed in laser fundus photographs and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, respectively. Some believe these findings represent true anatomical structural changes while others hypothesize that they are artifacts of interference; however, to our knowledge, no previous study has provided evidence to support either theory.</p> Methods <p>This retrospective case series analyzed CMR and OCT corrugations in 3 patients (6 eyes) with foveal hypoplasia. Dark fringe diameters of CMR at different wavelengths (λ: red = 635, green = 532, blue = 488 nm) and OCT corrugations of the first five dark fringes were measured. Dark fringe diameter was compared to fringe order (n) and λ using linear regression and t-tests.</p> Results <p>CMR fringe measurements demonstrated linear relationships between radius<sup>2</sup> (r<sup>2</sup>) and fringe order at all wavelengths (mean R<sup>2</sup>: 0.949, SD: 0.022, range: 0.911–0.985). OCT corrugation measurements also exhibited strong linearity with fringe order (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.998, 0.946). Fringe r<sup>2</sup> increased with wavelength but exceeded theoretical predictions (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), especially among ratios including shorter λ (mean difference r<sup>2</sup> red:green = 0.104, green:blue = 0.292, red:blue = 0.468).</p> Conclusions <p>This study is the first to provide evidence supporting an etiologic mechanism of CMR and HFL corrugations, showing correlation with physical phenomena of interference. CMR and HFL corrugations correlate with fringe order (n) and λ in a manner consistent with Newton’s rings (r<sup>2</sup> = nR’λ, <i>r</i> = radius, R’ = radius of curvature), suggesting these phenomena are imaging artifacts. Further research validating these results will be important.</p> Trial registration <p>This study does not report the results of a health care intervention on human participants.</p> Clinical trial disclosure <p>This study does not report results of a clinical trial.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Concentric macular rings and OCT corrugations in foveal hypoplasia: proof of concept for an optical interference mechanism

  • Ari H. August,
  • Ralph C. Eagle Jr,
  • Tatyana Milman,
  • Rebecca Procopio,
  • Bruce M. Schnall,
  • José S. Pulido

摘要

Background

Concentric macular rings (CMR) and Henle fiber layer (HFL) corrugations, potential clinical biomarkers of foveal hypoplasia, have been observed in laser fundus photographs and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, respectively. Some believe these findings represent true anatomical structural changes while others hypothesize that they are artifacts of interference; however, to our knowledge, no previous study has provided evidence to support either theory.

Methods

This retrospective case series analyzed CMR and OCT corrugations in 3 patients (6 eyes) with foveal hypoplasia. Dark fringe diameters of CMR at different wavelengths (λ: red = 635, green = 532, blue = 488 nm) and OCT corrugations of the first five dark fringes were measured. Dark fringe diameter was compared to fringe order (n) and λ using linear regression and t-tests.

Results

CMR fringe measurements demonstrated linear relationships between radius2 (r2) and fringe order at all wavelengths (mean R2: 0.949, SD: 0.022, range: 0.911–0.985). OCT corrugation measurements also exhibited strong linearity with fringe order (R2 = 0.998, 0.946). Fringe r2 increased with wavelength but exceeded theoretical predictions (p < 0.05), especially among ratios including shorter λ (mean difference r2 red:green = 0.104, green:blue = 0.292, red:blue = 0.468).

Conclusions

This study is the first to provide evidence supporting an etiologic mechanism of CMR and HFL corrugations, showing correlation with physical phenomena of interference. CMR and HFL corrugations correlate with fringe order (n) and λ in a manner consistent with Newton’s rings (r2 = nR’λ, r = radius, R’ = radius of curvature), suggesting these phenomena are imaging artifacts. Further research validating these results will be important.

Trial registration

This study does not report the results of a health care intervention on human participants.

Clinical trial disclosure

This study does not report results of a clinical trial.