Scholarlink

<p>Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) integrated with decentralized finance (DeFi) represent a transformative development in digital financial systems. However, there is a lack of systematic frameworks for prioritizing the determinants of effectiveness and sustainability in DeFi-integrated CBDC platform investments. This study develops an integrated multicriteria decision-making framework to identify critical evaluation criteria and rank alternative platform architectures under uncertainty. The proposed model combines objective expert weighting, interaction-sensitive criteria evaluation, and fuzzy-based alternative ranking within a unified analytical structure. The results indicate that technological infrastructure (0.168) and liquidity (0.167) are the most influential criteria, while hybrid and privacy-focused platforms emerge as the most suitable investment alternatives. These findings highlight the importance of balancing technological robustness, liquidity depth, and privacy considerations in CBDC design. The study contributes by offering a structured and uncertainty-sensitive decision framework to support strategic platform selection and policy formulation in evolving digital currency ecosystems.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Hybrid fuzzy decision-making approach to DeFi-integrated central bank digital currency platform selection

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月14日

查看全文
  • Wei Liu,
  • Yedan Shen,
  • Serkan Eti,
  • Hasan Dinçer,
  • Serhat Yüksel

摘要

Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) integrated with decentralized finance (DeFi) represent a transformative development in digital financial systems. However, there is a lack of systematic frameworks for prioritizing the determinants of effectiveness and sustainability in DeFi-integrated CBDC platform investments. This study develops an integrated multicriteria decision-making framework to identify critical evaluation criteria and rank alternative platform architectures under uncertainty. The proposed model combines objective expert weighting, interaction-sensitive criteria evaluation, and fuzzy-based alternative ranking within a unified analytical structure. The results indicate that technological infrastructure (0.168) and liquidity (0.167) are the most influential criteria, while hybrid and privacy-focused platforms emerge as the most suitable investment alternatives. These findings highlight the importance of balancing technological robustness, liquidity depth, and privacy considerations in CBDC design. The study contributes by offering a structured and uncertainty-sensitive decision framework to support strategic platform selection and policy formulation in evolving digital currency ecosystems.